Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1455057 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0517/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH 0517/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 19:10 +0200

#1455057 — [PATCH 0517/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c b/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c
index 133ab9f..b8708ca 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c
@@ -59,11 +59,11 @@
 #define fh_to_ctx(__fh)	container_of(__fh, struct coda_ctx, fh)
 
 int coda_debug;
-module_param(coda_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(coda_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(coda_debug, "Debug level (0-2)");
 
 static int disable_tiling;
-module_param(disable_tiling, int, 0644);
+module_param(disable_tiling, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_tiling, "Disable tiled frame buffers");
 
 void coda_write(struct coda_dev *dev, u32 data, u32 reg)
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web