Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1454997 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0544/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH 0544/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 18:50 +0200

#1454997 — [PATCH 0544/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/radio/radio-zoltrix.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/radio-zoltrix.c b/drivers/media/radio/radio-zoltrix.c
index 026e88e..8015866 100644
--- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-zoltrix.c
+++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-zoltrix.c
@@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ static int io[ZOLTRIX_MAX] = { [0] = CONFIG_RADIO_ZOLTRIX_PORT,
 			       [1 ... (ZOLTRIX_MAX - 1)] = -1 };
 static int radio_nr[ZOLTRIX_MAX] = { [0 ... (ZOLTRIX_MAX - 1)] = -1 };
 
-module_param_array(io, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(io, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(io, "I/O addresses of the Zoltrix Radio Plus card (0x20c or 0x30c)");
-module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(radio_nr, "Radio device numbers");
 
 struct zoltrix {
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web