Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1454391 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0812/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Started bySagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
First post2016-08-02 15:40 +0200
Last post2016-08-02 18:30 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0812/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> - 2016-08-02 15:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0812/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-02 18:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0812/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-08-02 18:30 +0200

#1454391 — Re: [PATCH 0812/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

FromSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Date2016-08-02 15:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0812/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Message-ID<s1I5k-54A-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
I assume that you didn't try to send a 1285 patches set :)

I think you can safely squash the two patches together.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1454847

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2016-08-02 18:00 +0200
Message-ID<s1KgO-6sT-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1454391
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:29:53PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> I assume that you didn't try to send a 1285 patches set :)

No he actually did. And some of us were unfortunate enough to be Cc'd on a
hundred of them.

> 
> I think you can safely squash the two patches together.

I've NAKed all patches I was Cc'd on. IMNSHO the change makes it less readable
and more error prone.

-- Steve

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1454949

FromBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date2016-08-02 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<s1KJR-6T7-99@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1454847
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:57:25AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> No he actually did. And some of us were unfortunate enough to be Cc'd
> on a hundred of them.

Lucky you, I got 400 and it is still counting...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web