Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1454911 > unrolled thread

Re: Linux 4.1.28

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Linux 4.1.28 Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de> - 2016-08-02 18:20 +0200
    Re: Linux 4.1.28 Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> - 2016-08-02 21:30 +0200

#1454911 — Re: Linux 4.1.28

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Michal Kubecek wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:04:48PM +0200, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
>> And that one?
>> Happens while trying to start a firewall script with iptables-restore.
>>
>> [  180.071999] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s!
>> [iptables-restor:2338]
> ...
>> [  180.072000] Call Trace:
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff8111a923>] ? __kmalloc_node+0x26/0x2d
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81667495>] ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x1d
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81668ec3>] ? xt_alloc_table_info+0xc2/0xdf
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffffc05be6c3>] do_ipt_set_ctl+0xfd/0x193 [ip_tables]
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81665181>] nf_sockopt+0x64/0x7e
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff816651cc>] nf_setsockopt+0x1c/0x20
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81674dd1>] ip_setsockopt+0x6e/0x8e
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff8168fe47>] raw_setsockopt+0x11/0x4c
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff816296ab>] sock_common_setsockopt+0xf/0x11
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81628ab2>] SyS_setsockopt+0x85/0xa5
>> [  180.072000]  [<ffffffff816e7dee>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71
>
> This should be the problem addressed by
>
>   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/422215
>
> Michal Kubecek

Hi,

I re-checked your patch today on top of a 4.1.29 and I'm very sorry
to say it actually does fix the problem despite what I wrote a few days 
ago.

I don't know why I saw the problem while I was sure I had that patch
applied. Maybe I mixed up the builds. Should have double checked it.

So, if that patch would appear in the next 4.1.y, that would be great.

talking about that patch:
  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/650120/
(as gmame is down atm)

thanks,

    Thomas

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1455426

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:14:22PM +0200, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:04:48PM +0200, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> >>And that one?
> >>Happens while trying to start a firewall script with iptables-restore.
> >>
> >>[  180.071999] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s!
> >>[iptables-restor:2338]
> >...
> >>[  180.072000] Call Trace:
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff8111a923>] ? __kmalloc_node+0x26/0x2d
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81667495>] ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x1d
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81668ec3>] ? xt_alloc_table_info+0xc2/0xdf
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffffc05be6c3>] do_ipt_set_ctl+0xfd/0x193 [ip_tables]
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81665181>] nf_sockopt+0x64/0x7e
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff816651cc>] nf_setsockopt+0x1c/0x20
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81674dd1>] ip_setsockopt+0x6e/0x8e
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff8168fe47>] raw_setsockopt+0x11/0x4c
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff816296ab>] sock_common_setsockopt+0xf/0x11
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff81628ab2>] SyS_setsockopt+0x85/0xa5
> >>[  180.072000]  [<ffffffff816e7dee>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71
> >
> >This should be the problem addressed by
> >
> >  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/422215
> 
> I re-checked your patch today on top of a 4.1.29 and I'm very sorry
> to say it actually does fix the problem despite what I wrote a few
> days ago.
> 
> I don't know why I saw the problem while I was sure I had that patch
> applied. Maybe I mixed up the builds. Should have double checked it.
> 
> So, if that patch would appear in the next 4.1.y, that would be great.
> 
> talking about that patch:
>  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/650120/
> (as gmame is down atm)

I used the old address of Sasha Levin so that he didn't get the e-mail
with the patch. I'll bounce it to his new address.

Michal Kubecek

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web