Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1454693 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0917/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH 0917/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 17:10 +0200

#1454693 — [PATCH 0917/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/osst.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osst.c b/drivers/scsi/osst.c
index 5033223..d74363e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/osst.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/osst.c
@@ -91,13 +91,13 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_ALIAS_CHARDEV_MAJOR(OSST_MAJOR);
 MODULE_ALIAS_SCSI_DEVICE(TYPE_TAPE);
 
-module_param(max_dev, int, 0444);
+module_param(max_dev, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_dev, "Maximum number of OnStream Tape Drives to attach (4)");
 
-module_param(write_threshold_kbs, int, 0644);
+module_param(write_threshold_kbs, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_threshold_kbs, "Asynchronous write threshold (KB; 32)");
 
-module_param(max_sg_segs, int, 0644);
+module_param(max_sg_segs, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_sg_segs, "Maximum number of scatter/gather segments to use (9)");
 #else
 static struct osst_dev_parm {
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web