Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1454576 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1040/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Started byBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
First post2016-08-02 16:40 +0200
Last post2016-08-02 16:40 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 1040/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 16:40 +0200

#1454576 — [PATCH 1040/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

FromBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date2016-08-02 16:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1040/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Message-ID<s1J1o-5FG-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
index 1420a3c..251e6c5 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
@@ -162,12 +162,12 @@ static struct ext4_attr ext4_attr_##_name = {			\
 
 #define ATTR_LIST(name) &ext4_attr_##name.attr
 
-EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(delayed_allocation_blocks, 0444);
-EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(session_write_kbytes, 0444);
-EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(lifetime_write_kbytes, 0444);
-EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(reserved_clusters, 0644);
+EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(delayed_allocation_blocks, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(session_write_kbytes, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(lifetime_write_kbytes, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(reserved_clusters, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
-EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(inode_readahead_blks, 0644, inode_readahead,
+EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(inode_readahead_blks, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, inode_readahead,
 		 ext4_sb_info, s_inode_readahead_blks);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(inode_goal, s_inode_goal);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stats, s_mb_stats);
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_order2_req, s_mb_order2_reqs);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stream_req, s_mb_stream_request);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_group_prealloc, s_mb_group_prealloc);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(extent_max_zeroout_kb, s_extent_max_zeroout_kb);
-EXT4_ATTR(trigger_fs_error, 0200, trigger_test_error);
+EXT4_ATTR(trigger_fs_error, S_IWUSR, trigger_test_error);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(err_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_err_ratelimit_state.interval);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(err_ratelimit_burst, s_err_ratelimit_state.burst);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_warning_ratelimit_state.interval);
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ EXT4_RO_ATTR_ES_UI(first_error_time, s_first_error_time);
 EXT4_RO_ATTR_ES_UI(last_error_time, s_last_error_time);
 
 static unsigned int old_bump_val = 128;
-EXT4_ATTR_PTR(max_writeback_mb_bump, 0444, pointer_ui, &old_bump_val);
+EXT4_ATTR_PTR(max_writeback_mb_bump, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, pointer_ui, &old_bump_val);
 
 static struct attribute *ext4_attrs[] = {
 	ATTR_LIST(delayed_allocation_blocks),
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web