Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1454433 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 15:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-02 15:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0123/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 15:50 +0200
| From | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 15:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0123/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Message-ID | <s1If1-589-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c index 1b80621..9a375de 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ out: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(speedstep_get_freqs); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_RELAXED_CAP_CHECK -module_param(relaxed_check, int, 0444); +module_param(relaxed_check, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(relaxed_check, "Don't do all checks for speedstep capability."); #endif -- 2.9.2
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web