Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1454093 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 14:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-02 15:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3 04/14] KVM: x86: dynamic kvm_apic_map Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-08-02 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 04/14] KVM: x86: dynamic kvm_apic_map Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 15:30 +0200
| From | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 14:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 04/14] KVM: x86: dynamic kvm_apic_map |
| Message-ID | <s1GZB-4ne-91@gated-at.bofh.it> |
2016-08-02 19:39+0800, Wanpeng Li: > 2016-07-13 4:09 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>: > [...] >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c >> @@ -152,14 +152,22 @@ static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm) >> struct kvm_apic_map *new, *old = NULL; >> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; >> int i; >> - >> - new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_apic_map), GFP_KERNEL); >> + u32 max_id = 255; > > If this should be max_id = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID? I have a patch on hand to > fix it, but I didn't know whether it is your desired behavior or not. No, we could just have static array then. KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID is expected to be raised to INT_MAX and eventually UINT_MAX, so it would not be practical. The dynamic array is there to avoid wasting space in the common case, where VMs have only low APIC IDs. Inintial patches had 255 to minimize a chance of regressions as the static array was that big, but starting with max_id = 0 is our goal and should be ok even without other changes.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1HVD-50V-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1454093 |
2016-08-02 20:22 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>: > 2016-08-02 19:39+0800, Wanpeng Li: >> 2016-07-13 4:09 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>: >> [...] >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c >>> @@ -152,14 +152,22 @@ static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm) >>> struct kvm_apic_map *new, *old = NULL; >>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; >>> int i; >>> - >>> - new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_apic_map), GFP_KERNEL); >>> + u32 max_id = 255; >> >> If this should be max_id = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID? I have a patch on hand to >> fix it, but I didn't know whether it is your desired behavior or not. > > No, we could just have static array then. KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID is expected > to be raised to INT_MAX and eventually UINT_MAX, so it would not be > practical. The dynamic array is there to avoid wasting space in the > common case, where VMs have only low APIC IDs. > > Inintial patches had 255 to minimize a chance of regressions as the > static array was that big, but starting with max_id = 0 is our goal and > should be ok even without other changes. I see, thanks. :) Regards, Wanpeng Li
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web