Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1453946 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0468/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH 0468/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:00 +0200

#1453946 — [PATCH 0468/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c b/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c
index 0042803..49fffbc 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-core.c
@@ -34,11 +34,11 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Shu Lin - Hiep Huynh");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 
 static unsigned int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "enable debug messages");
 
 static unsigned int card[] = {[0 ... (CX25821_MAXBOARDS - 1)] = UNSET };
-module_param_array(card, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(card, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(card, "card type");
 
 const struct sram_channel cx25821_sram_channels[] = {
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web