Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1453944 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 14:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-02 18:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0435/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0435/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-08-02 18:20 +0200
| From | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 14:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0435/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Message-ID | <s1Gwy-3Wp-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
index 0b6d46c..d8ffd88 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0-2)");
struct tvp5150 {
--
2.9.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1KAb-6OZ-65@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1453944 |
There are so many of these, I wonder if it'd be better to just do one
giant patch, or at least break them up by subsystem instead of by
individual source file...
-Kees
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> index 0b6d46c..d8ffd88 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
>
> static int debug;
> -module_param(debug, int, 0644);
> +module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0-2)");
>
> struct tvp5150 {
> --
> 2.9.2
>
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web