Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1453944 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0435/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Started byBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
First post2016-08-02 14:00 +0200
Last post2016-08-02 18:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0435/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0435/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-08-02 18:20 +0200

#1453944 — [PATCH 0435/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

FromBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date2016-08-02 14:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0435/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Message-ID<s1Gwy-3Wp-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
index 0b6d46c..d8ffd88 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 
 
 static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0-2)");
 
 struct tvp5150 {
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1454910

FromKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date2016-08-02 18:20 +0200
Message-ID<s1KAb-6OZ-65@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1453944
There are so many of these, I wonder if it'd be better to just do one
giant patch, or at least break them up by subsystem instead of by
individual source file...

-Kees

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> index 0b6d46c..d8ffd88 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
>
>  static int debug;
> -module_param(debug, int, 0644);
> +module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0-2)");
>
>  struct tvp5150 {
> --
> 2.9.2
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web