Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1453856 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Started byBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
First post2016-08-02 13:40 +0200
Last post2016-08-02 17:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 13:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> - 2016-08-02 17:50 +0200

#1453856 — [PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

FromBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date2016-08-02 13:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Message-ID<s1Gdd-3Oh-63@gated-at.bofh.it>
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c b/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
index d58abdc..a7e4885 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static ssize_t store_alert_led(struct device *dev,
 	return count;
 }
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(alert_led, 0644, show_alert_led, store_alert_led);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(alert_led, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, show_alert_led, store_alert_led);
 
 static struct sensor_device_attribute fschmd_attr[] = {
 	SENSOR_ATTR(in0_input, 0444, show_in_value, NULL, 0),
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1454818

FromGreg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Date2016-08-02 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<s1K78-6pf-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1453856
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:52:21PM +0800, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c b/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
> index d58abdc..a7e4885 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
> @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static ssize_t store_alert_led(struct device *dev,
>  	return count;
>  }
>  
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(alert_led, 0644, show_alert_led, store_alert_led);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(alert_led, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, show_alert_led, store_alert_led);

Use DEVICE_ATTR_RW() please.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web