Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1453856 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 13:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-02 17:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> - 2016-08-02 17:50 +0200
| From | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 13:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Message-ID | <s1Gdd-3Oh-63@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c b/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
index d58abdc..a7e4885 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static ssize_t store_alert_led(struct device *dev,
return count;
}
-static DEVICE_ATTR(alert_led, 0644, show_alert_led, store_alert_led);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(alert_led, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, show_alert_led, store_alert_led);
static struct sensor_device_attribute fschmd_attr[] = {
SENSOR_ATTR(in0_input, 0444, show_in_value, NULL, 0),
--
2.9.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1K78-6pf-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1453856 |
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:52:21PM +0800, Baole Ni wrote: > I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, > and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, > thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. > > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> > --- > drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c b/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c > index d58abdc..a7e4885 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/fschmd.c > @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static ssize_t store_alert_led(struct device *dev, > return count; > } > > -static DEVICE_ATTR(alert_led, 0644, show_alert_led, store_alert_led); > +static DEVICE_ATTR(alert_led, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, show_alert_led, store_alert_led); Use DEVICE_ATTR_RW() please.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web