Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1454086 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0679/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Started byBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
First post2016-08-02 14:30 +0200
Last post2016-08-02 14:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0679/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:30 +0200

#1454086 — [PATCH 0679/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

FromBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date2016-08-02 14:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0679/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Message-ID<s1GZB-4ne-71@gated-at.bofh.it>
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/wm831x-otp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm831x-otp.c b/drivers/mfd/wm831x-otp.c
index ebac002..519283e 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm831x-otp.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm831x-otp.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static ssize_t wm831x_unique_id_show(struct device *dev,
 	return sprintf(buf, "%*phN\n", WM831X_UNIQUE_ID_LEN, id);
 }
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(unique_id, 0444, wm831x_unique_id_show, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(unique_id, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, wm831x_unique_id_show, NULL);
 
 int wm831x_otp_init(struct wm831x *wm831x)
 {
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web