Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1451924 > unrolled thread
| Started by | LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-28 15:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-29 11:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ethernet: add sun8i-emac driver LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ethernet: add sun8i-emac driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-07-29 11:30 +0200
| From | LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-28 15:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ethernet: add sun8i-emac driver |
| Message-ID | <rZToe-6L3-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 10:03:16 AM CEST LABBE Corentin wrote: > > + > > + /* Benched on OPIPC with 100M, setting more than 256 does not give any > > + * perf boost > > + */ > > + priv->nbdesc_rx = 128; > > + priv->nbdesc_tx = 256; > > + > > > > 256 tx descriptors can introduce a significant latency. Can you add > support for BQL (netdev_sent_queue/netdev_completed_queue) to limit > the queue size to the minimum? Done, since setting below 256 give lower performance with iperf. > > I also noticed that your tx_lock() prevents you from concurrently > running sun8i_emac_complete_xmit() and sun8i_emac_xmit(). Is that > necessary? I'd think that you can find a way to make them work > concurrently. > > Arnd I will reworked locking and it seems that no locking is necessary. I have added the following comment about the locking strategy: /* Locking strategy: * RX queue does not need any lock since only sun8i_emac_poll() access it. * (All other RX modifiers (ringparam/ndo_stop) disable NAPI and so sun8i_emac_poll()) * TX queue is handled by sun8i_emac_xmit(), sun8i_emac_complete_xmit() and sun8i_emac_tx_timeout() * (All other RX modifiers (ringparam/ndo_stop) disable NAPI and stop queue) * * sun8i_emac_xmit() could fire only once (netif_tx_lock) * sun8i_emac_complete_xmit() could fire only once (called from NAPI) * sun8i_emac_tx_timeout() could fire only once (netif_tx_lock) and couldnt * race with sun8i_emac_xmit (due to netif_tx_lock) and with sun8i_emac_complete_xmit which disable NAPI. * * So only sun8i_emac_xmit and sun8i_emac_complete_xmit could fire at the same time. * But they never could modify the same descriptors: * - sun8i_emac_complete_xmit() will modify only descriptors with empty status * - sun8i_emac_xmit() will modify only descriptors set to DCLEAN * Proper memory barriers ensure that descriptor set to DCLEAN could not be * modified latter by sun8i_emac_complete_xmit(). * */ Does I am right ? Thanks for your review. Regards LABBE Corentin
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-29 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s0chb-2Lh-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1451924 |
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 3:18:26 PM CEST LABBE Corentin wrote: > > I will reworked locking and it seems that no locking is necessary. > I have added the following comment about the locking strategy: > > /* Locking strategy: > * RX queue does not need any lock since only sun8i_emac_poll() access it. > * (All other RX modifiers (ringparam/ndo_stop) disable NAPI and so sun8i_emac_poll()) > * TX queue is handled by sun8i_emac_xmit(), sun8i_emac_complete_xmit() and sun8i_emac_tx_timeout() > * (All other RX modifiers (ringparam/ndo_stop) disable NAPI and stop queue) > * > * sun8i_emac_xmit() could fire only once (netif_tx_lock) > * sun8i_emac_complete_xmit() could fire only once (called from NAPI) > * sun8i_emac_tx_timeout() could fire only once (netif_tx_lock) and couldnt > * race with sun8i_emac_xmit (due to netif_tx_lock) and with sun8i_emac_complete_xmit which disable NAPI. > * > * So only sun8i_emac_xmit and sun8i_emac_complete_xmit could fire at the same time. > * But they never could modify the same descriptors: > * - sun8i_emac_complete_xmit() will modify only descriptors with empty status > * - sun8i_emac_xmit() will modify only descriptors set to DCLEAN > * Proper memory barriers ensure that descriptor set to DCLEAN could not be > * modified latter by sun8i_emac_complete_xmit(). > * */ Sounds good, the comment is certainly very helpful here. Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web