Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1401535 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-16 16:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-16 16:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] ring-buffer: Some overflow fixes Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-05-16 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] ring-buffer: Use long for nr_pages to avoid overflow failures Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-05-16 16:30 +0200
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 16:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] ring-buffer: Some overflow fixes |
| Message-ID | <rzrGW-892-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Linus,
I was hoping to get this to you before you released 4.6, but testing
went into the weekend, and I don't do work over the weekend. This
missed the release. Anyway...
Hao Qin reported an integer overflow possibility with signed and
unsigned numbers in the ring-buffer code.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118001
At first I did not think this was too much of an issue, because the
overflow would be caught later when either too much data was allocated
or it would trigger RB_WARN_ON() which shuts down the ring buffer.
But looking closer into it, I found that the right settings could bypass
the checks and crash the kernel. Luckily, this is only accessible
by root.
The first fix is to convert all the variables into long, such that
we don't get into issues between 32 bit variables being assigned 64 bit
ones. This fixes the RB_WARN_ON() triggering.
The next fix is to get rid of a duplicate DIV_ROUND_UP() that when called
twice with the right value, can cause a kernel crash.
The first DIV_ROUND_UP() is to normalize the input and it is checked
against the minimum allowable value. But then DIV_ROUND_UP() is called
again, which can overflow due to the (a + b - 1)/b, logic. The first
called upped the value, the second can overflow (with the +b part).
The second call to DIV_ROUND_UP() came in via a second change a while ago
and the code is cleaned up to remove it.
Please pull the latest trace-fixes-v4.6-rc7 tree, which can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
trace-fixes-v4.6-rc7
Tag SHA1: d85fb49268a70e889298446b589d34500aa74a41
Head SHA1: 59643d1535eb220668692a5359de22545af579f6
Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (2):
ring-buffer: Use long for nr_pages to avoid overflow failures
ring-buffer: Prevent overflow of size in ring_buffer_resize()
----
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 16:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/2] ring-buffer: Use long for nr_pages to avoid overflow failures |
| Message-ID | <rzrGX-892-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401535 |
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The size variable to change the ring buffer in ftrace is a long. The
nr_pages used to update the ring buffer based on the size is int. On 64 bit
machines this can cause an overflow problem.
For example, the following will cause the ring buffer to crash:
# cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
# echo 10 > buffer_size_kb
# echo 8556384240 > buffer_size_kb
Then you get the warning of:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 318 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:1527 rb_update_pages+0x22f/0x260
Which is:
RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, nr_removed);
Note each ring buffer page holds 4080 bytes.
This is because:
1) 10 causes the ring buffer to have 3 pages.
(10kb requires 3 * 4080 pages to hold)
2) (2^31 / 2^10 + 1) * 4080 = 8556384240
The value written into buffer_size_kb is shifted by 10 and then passed
to ring_buffer_resize(). 8556384240 * 2^10 = 8761737461760
3) The size passed to ring_buffer_resize() is then divided by BUF_PAGE_SIZE
which is 4080. 8761737461760 / 4080 = 2147484672
4) nr_pages is subtracted from the current nr_pages (3) and we get:
2147484669. This value is saved in a signed integer nr_pages_to_update
5) 2147484669 is greater than 2^31 but smaller than 2^32, a signed int
turns into the value of -2147482627
6) As the value is a negative number, in update_pages_handler() it is
negated and passed to rb_remove_pages() and 2147482627 pages will
be removed, which is much larger than 3 and it causes the warning
because not all the pages asked to be removed were removed.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118001
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.28+
Fixes: 7a8e76a3829f1 ("tracing: unified trace buffer")
Reported-by: Hao Qin <QEver.cn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 95181e36891a..99d64cd58c52 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ struct ring_buffer_per_cpu {
raw_spinlock_t reader_lock; /* serialize readers */
arch_spinlock_t lock;
struct lock_class_key lock_key;
- unsigned int nr_pages;
+ unsigned long nr_pages;
unsigned int current_context;
struct list_head *pages;
struct buffer_page *head_page; /* read from head */
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ struct ring_buffer_per_cpu {
u64 write_stamp;
u64 read_stamp;
/* ring buffer pages to update, > 0 to add, < 0 to remove */
- int nr_pages_to_update;
+ long nr_pages_to_update;
struct list_head new_pages; /* new pages to add */
struct work_struct update_pages_work;
struct completion update_done;
@@ -1128,10 +1128,10 @@ static int rb_check_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
return 0;
}
-static int __rb_allocate_pages(int nr_pages, struct list_head *pages, int cpu)
+static int __rb_allocate_pages(long nr_pages, struct list_head *pages, int cpu)
{
- int i;
struct buffer_page *bpage, *tmp;
+ long i;
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
struct page *page;
@@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ free_pages:
}
static int rb_allocate_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
- unsigned nr_pages)
+ unsigned long nr_pages)
{
LIST_HEAD(pages);
@@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ static int rb_allocate_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
}
static struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *
-rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int nr_pages, int cpu)
+rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(struct ring_buffer *buffer, long nr_pages, int cpu)
{
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
struct buffer_page *bpage;
@@ -1293,8 +1293,9 @@ struct ring_buffer *__ring_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size, unsigned flags,
struct lock_class_key *key)
{
struct ring_buffer *buffer;
+ long nr_pages;
int bsize;
- int cpu, nr_pages;
+ int cpu;
/* keep it in its own cache line */
buffer = kzalloc(ALIGN(sizeof(*buffer), cache_line_size()),
@@ -1420,12 +1421,12 @@ static inline unsigned long rb_page_write(struct buffer_page *bpage)
}
static int
-rb_remove_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, unsigned int nr_pages)
+rb_remove_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, unsigned long nr_pages)
{
struct list_head *tail_page, *to_remove, *next_page;
struct buffer_page *to_remove_page, *tmp_iter_page;
struct buffer_page *last_page, *first_page;
- unsigned int nr_removed;
+ unsigned long nr_removed;
unsigned long head_bit;
int page_entries;
@@ -1642,7 +1643,7 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long size,
int cpu_id)
{
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
- unsigned nr_pages;
+ unsigned long nr_pages;
int cpu, err = 0;
/*
@@ -4640,8 +4641,9 @@ static int rb_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
struct ring_buffer *buffer =
container_of(self, struct ring_buffer, cpu_notify);
long cpu = (long)hcpu;
- int cpu_i, nr_pages_same;
- unsigned int nr_pages;
+ long nr_pages_same;
+ int cpu_i;
+ unsigned long nr_pages;
switch (action) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web