Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1401436 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] Xen: don't warn about 2-byte wchar_t in efi

Started byStefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
First post2016-05-16 13:10 +0200
Last post2016-05-18 12:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] Xen: don't warn about 2-byte wchar_t in efi Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-05-16 13:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] Xen: don't warn about 2-byte wchar_t in efi Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-18 12:20 +0200

#1401436 — Re: [PATCH] Xen: don't warn about 2-byte wchar_t in efi

FromStefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Date2016-05-16 13:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Xen: don't warn about 2-byte wchar_t in efi
Message-ID<rzozo-6b7-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The XEN UEFI code has become available on the ARM architecture
> recently, but now causes a link-time warning:
> 
> ld: warning: drivers/xen/efi.o uses 2-byte wchar_t yet the output is to use 4-byte wchar_t; use of wchar_t values across objects may fail
> 
> This seems harmless, because the efi code only uses 2-byte
> characters when interacting with EFI, so we don't pass on those
> strings to elsewhere in the system, and we just need to
> silence the warning.
> 
> It is not clear to me whether we actually need to build the file
> with the -fshort-wchar flag, but if we do, then we should also
> pass --no-wchar-size-warning to the linker, to avoid the warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 37060935dc04 ("ARM64: XEN: Add a function to initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services")

Given that drivers/xen/efi.c doesn't actually use any wchar_t, it is not
clear to me whether we need to pass -fshort-wchar either. However this
patch is correct any, so I committed it to xentip.


>  drivers/xen/Makefile | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Makefile b/drivers/xen/Makefile
> index 415f2869054b..8feab810aed9 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/xen/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
>  CFLAGS_features.o			:= $(nostackp)
>  
>  CFLAGS_efi.o				+= -fshort-wchar
> +LDFLAGS					+= $(call ld-option, --no-wchar-size-warning)
>  
>  dom0-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += arm-device.o
>  dom0-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci.o
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1402858

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-05-18 12:20 +0200
Message-ID<rA6K6-JL-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1401436
On Monday 16 May 2016 12:08:17 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The XEN UEFI code has become available on the ARM architecture
> > recently, but now causes a link-time warning:
> > 
> > ld: warning: drivers/xen/efi.o uses 2-byte wchar_t yet the output is to use 4-byte wchar_t; use of wchar_t values across objects may fail
> > 
> > This seems harmless, because the efi code only uses 2-byte
> > characters when interacting with EFI, so we don't pass on those
> > strings to elsewhere in the system, and we just need to
> > silence the warning.
> > 
> > It is not clear to me whether we actually need to build the file
> > with the -fshort-wchar flag, but if we do, then we should also
> > pass --no-wchar-size-warning to the linker, to avoid the warning.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Fixes: 37060935dc04 ("ARM64: XEN: Add a function to initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services")
> 
> Given that drivers/xen/efi.c doesn't actually use any wchar_t, it is not
> clear to me whether we need to pass -fshort-wchar either. However this
> patch is correct any, so I committed it to xentip.

Right, I was wondering about that too, but it has been this way since the
code was first merged, so I couldn't figure out if removing the flag
had any side-effects.

	Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web