Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1401254 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-16 04:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-16 04:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] zsmalloc: use bit_spin_lock Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:10 +0200
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 04:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] zsmalloc: use bit_spin_lock |
| Message-ID | <rzg8Y-u7-293@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On (05/09/16 11:20), Minchan Kim wrote: > > Use kernel standard bit spin-lock instead of custom mess. Even, it has > a bug which doesn't disable preemption. The reason we don't have any > problem is that we have used it during preemption disable section > by class->lock spinlock. So no need to go to stable. > > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> good change. Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> -ss
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web