Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1402539 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2] exec: clarify reasoning for euid/egid reset

Started byKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
First post2016-05-17 21:20 +0200
Last post2016-05-17 23:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v2] exec: clarify reasoning for euid/egid reset Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-05-17 21:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] exec: clarify reasoning for euid/egid reset Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-17 23:00 +0200

#1402539 — [PATCH v2] exec: clarify reasoning for euid/egid reset

FromKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date2016-05-17 21:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2] exec: clarify reasoning for euid/egid reset
Message-ID<rzSH7-aP-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
This section of code initially looks redundant, but is required. This
improves the comment to explain more clearly why the reset is needed.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
---
v2:
- clarified example as a setuid script, dhowells
---
 fs/exec.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index c4010b8207a1..a98b21d47385 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1387,7 +1387,12 @@ static void bprm_fill_uid(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	kuid_t uid;
 	kgid_t gid;
 
-	/* clear any previous set[ug]id data from a previous binary */
+	/*
+	 * Since this can be called multiple times (via prepare_binprm),
+	 * we must clear any previous work done when setting set[ug]id
+	 * bits from any earlier bprm->file uses (for example when run
+	 * first for a setuid script then again for its interpreter).
+	 */
 	bprm->cred->euid = current_euid();
 	bprm->cred->egid = current_egid();
 
-- 
2.6.3


-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1402595

FromLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date2016-05-17 23:00 +0200
Message-ID<rzUfT-ZV-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1402539
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> This section of code initially looks redundant, but is required. This
> improves the comment to explain more clearly why the reset is needed.

Applied.

      Linus

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web