Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1400243 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/19] get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT

Started byMichal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
First post2016-05-12 19:10 +0200
Last post2016-05-13 09:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/19] get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-05-12 19:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/19] get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-12 22:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/19] get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-05-13 09:00 +0200

#1400243 — Re: [PATCH 0/19] get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT

FromMichal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date2016-05-12 19:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/19] get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT
Message-ID<ry2hz-1IC-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Andrew,
do you think this should go in in the next merge window or should I
repost after rc1 is out? I do not mind one way or the other. I would
obviously would like to get them in sooner rather than later but I can
certainly live with these wait a bit longer.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1400345

FromAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date2016-05-12 22:20 +0200
Message-ID<ry5fr-4uS-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1400243
On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:53:11 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:

> Andrew,
> do you think this should go in in the next merge window or should I
> repost after rc1 is out? I do not mind one way or the other. I would
> obviously would like to get them in sooner rather than later but I can
> certainly live with these wait a bit longer.

Yup, after -rc1 would suit.  Or resend them now and I'll queue them for
4.7-rc2.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1400539

FromMichal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date2016-05-13 09:00 +0200
Message-ID<ryfeO-6kr-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1400345
On Thu 12-05-16 13:13:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:53:11 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew,
> > do you think this should go in in the next merge window or should I
> > repost after rc1 is out? I do not mind one way or the other. I would
> > obviously would like to get them in sooner rather than later but I can
> > certainly live with these wait a bit longer.
> 
> Yup, after -rc1 would suit.  Or resend them now and I'll queue them for
> 4.7-rc2.

OK, rc2 sounds good as well. It is mostly cleanup without any visible
effect.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web