Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1398573 > unrolled thread

linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2016-05-11 01:30 +0200
Last post2016-05-11 01:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-05-11 01:30 +0200

#1398573 — linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-05-11 01:30 +0200
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree
Message-ID<rxpgd-4fX-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/overlayfs/super.c

between commit:

  420598d5bf9c ("ovl: ignore permissions on underlying lookup")

from the overlayfs tree and commit:

  b9e1d435fdf4 ("ovl_lookup_real(): use lookup_one_len_unlocked()")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (I abitrarily chose the overlayfs version (using
lookup_hash() instead of lookup_one_len_unlocked())) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web