Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1398596 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-11 02:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-11 17:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-05-11 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-05-11 17:10 +0200
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-11 02:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) |
| Message-ID | <rxpSW-52V-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 01:30:12 PM Sudeep Holla wrote: > This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle > (LPI) on ARM64. > > It also selects ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_LPI if ACPI is enabled > on ARM64. Can you remind me why we need the ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_LPI thing in addition to the previously defined ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE? I thought supporting LPI would not require an arch Kconfig option. Thanks, Rafael
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-11 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rxDVV-2hX-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1398596 |
On 11/05/16 01:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 01:30:12 PM Sudeep Holla wrote: >> This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle >> (LPI) on ARM64. >> >> It also selects ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_LPI if ACPI is enabled >> on ARM64. > > Can you remind me why we need the ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_LPI thing in > addition to the previously defined ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE? > That's stupid of me, I removed it from the driver in v4 but the few remnants of it stayed by mistake(mainly in this patch alone) > I thought supporting LPI would not require an arch Kconfig option. > That's correct. -- Regards, Sudeep
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web