Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1394642 > unrolled thread

[PART1 V5 12/13] svm: Do not intercept CR8 when enable AVIC

Started bySuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
First post2016-05-04 21:20 +0200
Last post2016-05-10 17:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PART1 V5 12/13] svm: Do not intercept CR8 when enable AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2016-05-04 21:20 +0200
    Re: [PART1 V5 12/13] svm: Do not intercept CR8 when enable AVIC Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-05-10 17:20 +0200

#1394642 — [PART1 V5 12/13] svm: Do not intercept CR8 when enable AVIC

FromSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date2016-05-04 21:20 +0200
Subject[PART1 V5 12/13] svm: Do not intercept CR8 when enable AVIC
Message-ID<rvav0-1pG-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
When enable AVIC:
    * Do not intercept CR8 since this should be handled by AVIC HW.
    * Also, we don't need to sync cr8/V_TPR and APIC backing page.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index d35fd61e..721e514 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1092,7 +1092,8 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	set_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR0_WRITE);
 	set_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR3_WRITE);
 	set_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR4_WRITE);
-	set_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE);
+	if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&svm->vcpu))
+		set_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE);
 
 	set_dr_intercepts(svm);
 
@@ -4077,11 +4078,17 @@ static void svm_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		SVM_EVTINJ_VALID | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_INTR;
 }
 
+static inline bool svm_in_nested_interrupt_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return is_guest_mode(vcpu) && (vcpu->arch.hflags & HF_VINTR_MASK);
+}
+
 static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int tpr, int irr)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 
-	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && (vcpu->arch.hflags & HF_VINTR_MASK))
+	if (svm_in_nested_interrupt_shadow(vcpu) ||
+	    kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
 		return;
 
 	clr_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE);
@@ -4254,7 +4261,7 @@ static inline void sync_cr8_to_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 
-	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && (vcpu->arch.hflags & HF_VINTR_MASK))
+	if (svm_in_nested_interrupt_shadow(vcpu))
 		return;
 
 	if (!is_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE)) {
@@ -4268,7 +4275,8 @@ static inline void sync_lapic_to_cr8(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 	u64 cr8;
 
-	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && (vcpu->arch.hflags & HF_VINTR_MASK))
+	if (svm_in_nested_interrupt_shadow(vcpu) ||
+	    kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
 		return;
 
 	cr8 = kvm_get_cr8(vcpu);
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1398200

FromPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date2016-05-10 17:20 +0200
Message-ID<rxhC2-4UM-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1394642

On 04/05/2016 21:09, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> +static inline bool svm_in_nested_interrupt_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return is_guest_mode(vcpu) && (vcpu->arch.hflags & HF_VINTR_MASK);
> +}
> +

A better name (yes, I know I suggested this one) is
svm_nested_virtualize_tpr.  I can change this when committing.

Paolo

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web