Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1390710 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-29 05:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-03 19:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 9 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v2 0/6] Add enhanced strobe support for emmc version 5.1 or later Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2016-04-29 05:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2016-04-29 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2016-05-04 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2016-05-04 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2016-05-05 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2016-05-09 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@kernel-upstream.org> - 2016-05-10 10:40 +0200
[PATCH v2 1/6] Documentation: mmc: add mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2016-04-29 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] Documentation: mmc: add mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-05-03 19:10 +0200
| From | Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 05:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 0/6] Add enhanced strobe support for emmc version 5.1 or later |
| Message-ID | <rt6Fc-6Ps-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello Ulf and Adrian, This patch is going to support enhanced strobe function for emmc version 5.1+ introduced by JEDEC recently. Enchanced strobe is a optional function, so we add a new cap* for drivers to decide whether to use it. When introduing hs400 mode, JEDEC asks controllers to use data strobe line to latch the data from emmc devives. But for cmd-reponse, not mentioned yet. Since emmc version 5.1 published, JEDEC adds enhanced strobe function to deal with cmd-response the same way as data-read. This feature is optional. From the spec(section 6.6.2.3), the standard scenario to select HS400 enhanced strobe mode illustrated like this: (1) set HS_TIMIMG (Highspeed) (2) Host change freq to <= 52Mhz (3) set the bus width to Enhanced strobe and DDR8Bit(CMD6), EXT_CSD[183] = 0x86 instead of 0x80 (4) set HS_TIMING to 0x3 (HS400) (5) Host change freq to <= 200Mhz (6) Host select HS400 enhanced strobe complete I can't find a upstreamed controller claimed to support it, as well as the mmc stack. But my "arasan,sdhci-5.1" actually supports this function. So I decide to work for this part. By looking into the SDHCI spec, I find there isn't any registers to enable the enhanced strobe function. But from my "arasan,sdhci-5.1" databook, it describes a register called VENDOR_REGISTER(0x78) to trigger this mode. So I guess other sdhci variant drivers may also need s vendor specific register to deal with it. If we are sure that our controller supports enhanced strobe mode, just add mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe in DT. Once emmc devices claims to support this mode, we enable it automatically. Of course, other sdhci*/non-sdhci drivers should implement/overwrite the prepare_enhanced_strobe by themselves. I believe all of the platforms which need to support this mode should do some basic preparation for their controllers. Currently I just limit the callback within ths scope of arasan,sdhci-5.1, but I prone to believe arasan will use VENDOR_REGISTER to tirgger this mode from now on because I do believe vendor will consider the registers' compatibility. With this patchset applied, we can successfully run in HS400 enhanced strobe mode on RK3399 platform with Samsung eMMC KLMBG2JENB-B041(v5.1, 16GB). mmc1: new HS400 Enhanced strobe MMC card at address 0001 mmcblk0: mmc1:0001 AJNB4R 14.6 GiB mmcblk0boot0: mmc1:0001 AJNB4R partition 1 4.00 MiB mmcblk0boot1: mmc1:0001 AJNB4R partition 2 4.00 MiB mmcblk0rpmb: mmc1:0001 AJNB4R partition 3 4.00 MiB Changes in v2: - switch to HS400ES from Highspeed mode directly Shawn Lin (6): Documentation: mmc: add mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe mmc: core: add mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe support mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support mmc: debugfs: add HS400 enhanced strobe description mmc: sdhci: implement enhanced strobe callback mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: overwrite enhanced strobe callback Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 + drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +- drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c | 4 +- drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 + drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 22 ++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 11 ++++ include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 + include/linux/mmc/host.h | 18 +++++++ include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 3 ++ 10 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.3.7
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 05:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support |
| Message-ID | <rt6Yx-7h3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390710 |
Controllers use data strobe line to latch data from devices
under hs400 mode, but not for cmd line. So since emmc 5.1, JEDEC
introduces enhanced strobe mode for latching cmd response from
emmc devices to host controllers. This new feature is optional,
so it depends both on device's cap and host's cap to decide
whether to use it or not.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
---
Changes in v2: None
drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +-
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 +
include/linux/mmc/host.h | 12 ++++++++
include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 3 ++
5 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
index 4bc48f1..7e94b9d 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
@@ -332,12 +332,13 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card)
mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
type);
} else {
- pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
+ pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
mmc_hostname(card->host),
mmc_card_uhs(card) ? "ultra high speed " :
(mmc_card_hs(card) ? "high speed " : ""),
mmc_card_hs400(card) ? "HS400 " :
(mmc_card_hs200(card) ? "HS200 " : ""),
+ mmc_card_hs400es(card) ? "Enhanced strobe" : "",
mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
uhs_bus_speed_mode, type, card->rca);
}
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index 28b477d..f45ed10 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ static void mmc_select_card_type(struct mmc_card *card)
avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V;
}
+ if ((caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ENHANCED_STROBE) &&
+ card->ext_csd.strobe_support &&
+ ((card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V) ||
+ (card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V)))
+ avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES;
+
card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = hs_max_dtr;
card->ext_csd.hs200_max_dtr = hs200_max_dtr;
card->mmc_avail_type = avail_type;
@@ -383,6 +389,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd)
mmc_card_set_blockaddr(card);
}
+ card->ext_csd.strobe_support = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT];
card->ext_csd.raw_card_type = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE];
mmc_select_card_type(card);
@@ -1062,9 +1069,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
u8 val;
/*
- * HS400 mode requires 8-bit bus width
+ * HS400(ES) mode requires 8-bit bus width
*/
- if (!(card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 &&
+ if (!(((card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400) ||
+ (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)) &&
host->ios.bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8))
return 0;
@@ -1097,9 +1105,26 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
}
/* Switch card to DDR */
+ val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8;
+ if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
+ val |= EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE;
+ /*
+ * Make sure we are in non-enhanced strobe mode before we
+ * actually enable it in ext_csd.
+ */
+ if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
+ err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, false);
+
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("%s: unprepare_enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host), err);
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
+
err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH,
- EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8,
+ val,
card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
if (err) {
pr_err("%s: switch to bus width for hs400 failed, err:%d\n",
@@ -1124,6 +1149,35 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400);
mmc_set_bus_speed(card);
+ if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
+ /* Controller enable enhanced strobe function */
+ if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
+ err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, true);
+
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("%s: prepare enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host), err);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * After switching to hs400 enhanced strobe mode, we expect to
+ * verify whether it works or not. If controller can't handle
+ * bus width test, compare ext_csd previously read in 1 bit mode
+ * against ext_csd at new bus width
+ */
+ if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST))
+ err = mmc_compare_ext_csds(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
+ else
+ err = mmc_bus_test(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
+
+ if (err) {
+ pr_warn("%s: switch to enhanced strobe failed\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host));
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
+
if (!send_status) {
err = mmc_switch_status(card);
if (err)
@@ -1297,7 +1351,8 @@ err:
}
/*
- * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported.
+ * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported. For HS400
+ * with enhanced strobe mode, we should activate High Speed.
*/
static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
{
@@ -1306,7 +1361,9 @@ static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
if (!mmc_can_ext_csd(card))
goto bus_speed;
- if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
+ if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)
+ err = mmc_select_hs(card);
+ else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
err = mmc_select_hs200(card);
else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS)
err = mmc_select_hs(card);
@@ -1578,7 +1635,15 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
} else if (mmc_card_hs(card)) {
/* Select the desired bus width optionally */
err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
- if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(err)) {
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(err))
+ goto free_card;
+
+ if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
+ /* Directly from HS to HS400-ES */
+ err = mmc_select_hs400(card);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_card;
+ } else {
err = mmc_select_hs_ddr(card);
if (err)
goto free_card;
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
index eb0151b..22defc2 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
u8 raw_partition_support; /* 160 */
u8 raw_rpmb_size_mult; /* 168 */
u8 raw_erased_mem_count; /* 181 */
+ u8 strobe_support; /* 184 */
u8 raw_ext_csd_structure; /* 194 */
u8 raw_card_type; /* 196 */
u8 raw_driver_strength; /* 197 */
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
index 11e89d3..19de56c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/mmc/core.h>
#include <linux/mmc/card.h>
+#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
#include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
struct mmc_ios {
@@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
/* Prepare HS400 target operating frequency depending host driver */
int (*prepare_hs400_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios);
+ /* Prepare enhanced strobe depending host driver */
+ int (*prepare_enhanced_strobe)(struct mmc_host *host, bool enable);
int (*select_drive_strength)(struct mmc_card *card,
unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
int card_drv, int *drv_type);
@@ -518,6 +521,15 @@ static inline bool mmc_card_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
return card->host->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400;
}
+static inline bool mmc_card_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card)
+{
+ if (mmc_card_hs400(card) &&
+ (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void mmc_retune_timer_stop(struct mmc_host *host);
static inline void mmc_retune_needed(struct mmc_host *host)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
index 15f2c4a..c376209 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
#define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG 179 /* R/W */
#define EXT_CSD_ERASED_MEM_CONT 181 /* RO */
#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH 183 /* R/W */
+#define EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT 184 /* RO */
#define EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING 185 /* R/W */
#define EXT_CSD_POWER_CLASS 187 /* R/W */
#define EXT_CSD_REV 192 /* RO */
@@ -380,12 +381,14 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V (1<<7) /* Card can run at 200MHz DDR, 1.2V */
#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 (EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V | \
EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V)
+#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES (1<<8) /* Card can run at HS400ES */
#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_1 0 /* Card is in 1 bit mode */
#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4 1 /* Card is in 4 bit mode */
#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8 2 /* Card is in 8 bit mode */
#define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_4 5 /* Card is in 4 bit DDR mode */
#define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 6 /* Card is in 8 bit DDR mode */
+#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE BIT(7) /* Enhanced strobe mode */
#define EXT_CSD_TIMING_BC 0 /* Backwards compatility */
#define EXT_CSD_TIMING_HS 1 /* High speed */
--
2.3.7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-04 14:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support |
| Message-ID | <rv3MS-3xj-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390711 |
On 29 April 2016 at 04:47, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> Controllers use data strobe line to latch data from devices
> under hs400 mode, but not for cmd line. So since emmc 5.1, JEDEC
> introduces enhanced strobe mode for latching cmd response from
> emmc devices to host controllers. This new feature is optional,
> so it depends both on device's cap and host's cap to decide
> whether to use it or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +-
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 +
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 12 ++++++++
> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 3 ++
> 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
> index 4bc48f1..7e94b9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
> @@ -332,12 +332,13 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card)
> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
> type);
> } else {
> - pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
> + pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
> mmc_hostname(card->host),
> mmc_card_uhs(card) ? "ultra high speed " :
> (mmc_card_hs(card) ? "high speed " : ""),
> mmc_card_hs400(card) ? "HS400 " :
> (mmc_card_hs200(card) ? "HS200 " : ""),
> + mmc_card_hs400es(card) ? "Enhanced strobe" : "",
I am not sure this informations should be printed. It's still and
HS400 card, there is no performance impact, right?
> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
> uhs_bus_speed_mode, type, card->rca);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> index 28b477d..f45ed10 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ static void mmc_select_card_type(struct mmc_card *card)
> avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V;
> }
>
> + if ((caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ENHANCED_STROBE) &&
> + card->ext_csd.strobe_support &&
> + ((card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V) ||
> + (card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V)))
> + avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES;
> +
> card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = hs_max_dtr;
> card->ext_csd.hs200_max_dtr = hs200_max_dtr;
> card->mmc_avail_type = avail_type;
> @@ -383,6 +389,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd)
> mmc_card_set_blockaddr(card);
> }
>
> + card->ext_csd.strobe_support = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT];
> card->ext_csd.raw_card_type = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE];
> mmc_select_card_type(card);
>
> @@ -1062,9 +1069,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
> u8 val;
>
> /*
> - * HS400 mode requires 8-bit bus width
> + * HS400(ES) mode requires 8-bit bus width
> */
> - if (!(card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 &&
> + if (!(((card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400) ||
> + (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)) &&
> host->ios.bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -1097,9 +1105,26 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
> }
>
> /* Switch card to DDR */
> + val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
> + val |= EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE;
> + /*
> + * Make sure we are in non-enhanced strobe mode before we
> + * actually enable it in ext_csd.
> + */
> + if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
> + err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, false);
1) I suggest we rename the callback to "hs400_enhanced_strobe".
2) I think this might be is a bit late to deal with restoring enhanced
strobe to off. Perhaps we should do that in mmc_set_initial_state()
instead!?
> +
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("%s: unprepare_enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
Maybe pr_dbg instead?
/s/unprepare_enhanced strobe/Disable hs400 es
> + mmc_hostname(host), err);
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH,
> - EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8,
> + val,
> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
> if (err) {
> pr_err("%s: switch to bus width for hs400 failed, err:%d\n",
> @@ -1124,6 +1149,35 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
> mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400);
> mmc_set_bus_speed(card);
>
> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
> + /* Controller enable enhanced strobe function */
> + if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
> + err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, true);
> +
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("%s: prepare enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
Maybe pr_dbg/warn instead?
/s/prepare enhanced strobe/Enable hs400 es
> + mmc_hostname(host), err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * After switching to hs400 enhanced strobe mode, we expect to
> + * verify whether it works or not. If controller can't handle
> + * bus width test, compare ext_csd previously read in 1 bit mode
> + * against ext_csd at new bus width
> + */
Is this according to spec? If so, we should probably state that here.
If not, further explanation for *why* we do this is needed.
> + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST))
> + err = mmc_compare_ext_csds(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
> + else
> + err = mmc_bus_test(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
> +
> + if (err) {
> + pr_warn("%s: switch to enhanced strobe failed\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host));
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!send_status) {
> err = mmc_switch_status(card);
> if (err)
> @@ -1297,7 +1351,8 @@ err:
> }
>
> /*
> - * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported.
> + * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported. For HS400
> + * with enhanced strobe mode, we should activate High Speed.
> */
> static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
> {
> @@ -1306,7 +1361,9 @@ static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
> if (!mmc_can_ext_csd(card))
> goto bus_speed;
>
> - if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)
> + err = mmc_select_hs(card);
> + else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
> err = mmc_select_hs200(card);
> else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS)
> err = mmc_select_hs(card);
> @@ -1578,7 +1635,15 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> } else if (mmc_card_hs(card)) {
> /* Select the desired bus width optionally */
> err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
> - if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(err)) {
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(err))
> + goto free_card;
This is going to change the behaviour, as earlier switching the bus
width was optional. See the comment a few lines above and the
implementation of mmc_select_bus_width().
> +
> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
> + /* Directly from HS to HS400-ES */
> + err = mmc_select_hs400(card);
> + if (err)
> + goto free_card;
> + } else {
> err = mmc_select_hs_ddr(card);
> if (err)
> goto free_card;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> index eb0151b..22defc2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
> u8 raw_partition_support; /* 160 */
> u8 raw_rpmb_size_mult; /* 168 */
> u8 raw_erased_mem_count; /* 181 */
> + u8 strobe_support; /* 184 */
> u8 raw_ext_csd_structure; /* 194 */
> u8 raw_card_type; /* 196 */
> u8 raw_driver_strength; /* 197 */
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index 11e89d3..19de56c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/mmc/core.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
> +#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
>
> struct mmc_ios {
> @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
>
> /* Prepare HS400 target operating frequency depending host driver */
> int (*prepare_hs400_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> + /* Prepare enhanced strobe depending host driver */
> + int (*prepare_enhanced_strobe)(struct mmc_host *host, bool enable);
> int (*select_drive_strength)(struct mmc_card *card,
> unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
> int card_drv, int *drv_type);
> @@ -518,6 +521,15 @@ static inline bool mmc_card_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
> return card->host->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400;
> }
>
> +static inline bool mmc_card_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card)
> +{
> + if (mmc_card_hs400(card) &&
> + (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES))
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> void mmc_retune_timer_stop(struct mmc_host *host);
>
> static inline void mmc_retune_needed(struct mmc_host *host)
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> index 15f2c4a..c376209 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
> #define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG 179 /* R/W */
> #define EXT_CSD_ERASED_MEM_CONT 181 /* RO */
> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH 183 /* R/W */
> +#define EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT 184 /* RO */
> #define EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING 185 /* R/W */
> #define EXT_CSD_POWER_CLASS 187 /* R/W */
> #define EXT_CSD_REV 192 /* RO */
> @@ -380,12 +381,14 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V (1<<7) /* Card can run at 200MHz DDR, 1.2V */
> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 (EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V | \
> EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V)
> +#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES (1<<8) /* Card can run at HS400ES */
>
> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_1 0 /* Card is in 1 bit mode */
> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4 1 /* Card is in 4 bit mode */
> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8 2 /* Card is in 8 bit mode */
> #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_4 5 /* Card is in 4 bit DDR mode */
> #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 6 /* Card is in 8 bit DDR mode */
> +#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE BIT(7) /* Enhanced strobe mode */
>
> #define EXT_CSD_TIMING_BC 0 /* Backwards compatility */
> #define EXT_CSD_TIMING_HS 1 /* High speed */
> --
> 2.3.7
>
>
Kind regards
Uffe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-04 15:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support |
| Message-ID | <rv4SD-4va-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1394209 |
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> index 4bc48f1..7e94b9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> @@ -332,12 +332,13 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card)
>> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
>> type);
>> } else {
>> - pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
>> + pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
>> mmc_hostname(card->host),
>> mmc_card_uhs(card) ? "ultra high speed " :
>> (mmc_card_hs(card) ? "high speed " : ""),
>> mmc_card_hs400(card) ? "HS400 " :
>> (mmc_card_hs200(card) ? "HS200 " : ""),
>> + mmc_card_hs400es(card) ? "Enhanced strobe" : "",
>
> I am not sure this informations should be printed. It's still and
> HS400 card, there is no performance impact, right?
I actually asked for that I think. HS400ES does not need re-tuning so there
is a performance and behavioural change which I think it is very useful to
know. Kernels which don't support HS400ES will show "HS400" whereas kernels
which do support it will show something different.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-05 04:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support |
| Message-ID | <rvh3s-7GB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1394209 |
On 2016/5/4 20:02, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 29 April 2016 at 04:47, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> Controllers use data strobe line to latch data from devices
>> under hs400 mode, but not for cmd line. So since emmc 5.1, JEDEC
>> introduces enhanced strobe mode for latching cmd response from
>> emmc devices to host controllers. This new feature is optional,
>> so it depends both on device's cap and host's cap to decide
>> whether to use it or not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>> drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 12 ++++++++
>> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 3 ++
>> 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> index 4bc48f1..7e94b9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> @@ -332,12 +332,13 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card)
>> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
>> type);
>> } else {
>> - pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
>> + pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
>> mmc_hostname(card->host),
>> mmc_card_uhs(card) ? "ultra high speed " :
>> (mmc_card_hs(card) ? "high speed " : ""),
>> mmc_card_hs400(card) ? "HS400 " :
>> (mmc_card_hs200(card) ? "HS200 " : ""),
>> + mmc_card_hs400es(card) ? "Enhanced strobe" : "",
>
> I am not sure this informations should be printed. It's still and
> HS400 card, there is no performance impact, right?
Just as Adrain said, a significant behaviour for hs400es is that
it doesn't need tuning/re-tune stuff. So I prone to keep it here.
>
>> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
>> uhs_bus_speed_mode, type, card->rca);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> index 28b477d..f45ed10 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> @@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ static void mmc_select_card_type(struct mmc_card *card)
>> avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V;
>> }
>>
>> + if ((caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ENHANCED_STROBE) &&
>> + card->ext_csd.strobe_support &&
>> + ((card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V) ||
>> + (card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V)))
>> + avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES;
>> +
>> card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = hs_max_dtr;
>> card->ext_csd.hs200_max_dtr = hs200_max_dtr;
>> card->mmc_avail_type = avail_type;
>> @@ -383,6 +389,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd)
>> mmc_card_set_blockaddr(card);
>> }
>>
>> + card->ext_csd.strobe_support = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT];
>> card->ext_csd.raw_card_type = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE];
>> mmc_select_card_type(card);
>>
>> @@ -1062,9 +1069,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
>> u8 val;
>>
>> /*
>> - * HS400 mode requires 8-bit bus width
>> + * HS400(ES) mode requires 8-bit bus width
>> */
>> - if (!(card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 &&
>> + if (!(((card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400) ||
>> + (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)) &&
>> host->ios.bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8))
>> return 0;
>>
>> @@ -1097,9 +1105,26 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
>> }
>>
>> /* Switch card to DDR */
>> + val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8;
>> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
>> + val |= EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE;
>> + /*
>> + * Make sure we are in non-enhanced strobe mode before we
>> + * actually enable it in ext_csd.
>> + */
>> + if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
>> + err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, false);
>
> 1) I suggest we rename the callback to "hs400_enhanced_strobe".
Aha, personal taste?
I'm ok for whatever the name to be :)
>
> 2) I think this might be is a bit late to deal with restoring enhanced
> strobe to off. Perhaps we should do that in mmc_set_initial_state()
> instead!?
>
Good idea.
>> +
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_err("%s: unprepare_enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
>
> Maybe pr_dbg instead?
>
> /s/unprepare_enhanced strobe/Disable hs400 es
ok, most of the failure in mmc_init_card use
pr_warn/dbg.
So will fix it.
>
>> + mmc_hostname(host), err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>> EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH,
>> - EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8,
>> + val,
>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
>> if (err) {
>> pr_err("%s: switch to bus width for hs400 failed, err:%d\n",
>> @@ -1124,6 +1149,35 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
>> mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400);
>> mmc_set_bus_speed(card);
>>
>> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
>> + /* Controller enable enhanced strobe function */
>> + if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
>> + err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, true);
>> +
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_err("%s: prepare enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
>
> Maybe pr_dbg/warn instead?
>
> /s/prepare enhanced strobe/Enable hs400 es
>
>> + mmc_hostname(host), err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * After switching to hs400 enhanced strobe mode, we expect to
>> + * verify whether it works or not. If controller can't handle
>> + * bus width test, compare ext_csd previously read in 1 bit mode
>> + * against ext_csd at new bus width
>> + */
>
> Is this according to spec? If so, we should probably state that here.
> If not, further explanation for *why* we do this is needed.
It's NOT from spec. Just like switch bus width, enabling enhanced strobe
brings different IO-interface timing, so I add this check to make sure
both the device and host to be ok under hs400es, otherwise we show
hs400es successfully but failing to read superblock later if mounted.
So check it in advanced is probably sane?
>
>> + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST))
>> + err = mmc_compare_ext_csds(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
>> + else
>> + err = mmc_bus_test(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
>> +
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_warn("%s: switch to enhanced strobe failed\n",
>> + mmc_hostname(host));
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!send_status) {
>> err = mmc_switch_status(card);
>> if (err)
>> @@ -1297,7 +1351,8 @@ err:
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported.
>> + * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported. For HS400
>> + * with enhanced strobe mode, we should activate High Speed.
>> */
>> static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
>> {
>> @@ -1306,7 +1361,9 @@ static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
>> if (!mmc_can_ext_csd(card))
>> goto bus_speed;
>>
>> - if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
>> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)
>> + err = mmc_select_hs(card);
>> + else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
>> err = mmc_select_hs200(card);
>> else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS)
>> err = mmc_select_hs(card);
>> @@ -1578,7 +1635,15 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
>> } else if (mmc_card_hs(card)) {
>> /* Select the desired bus width optionally */
>> err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
>> - if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(err)) {
>> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(err))
>> + goto free_card;
>
> This is going to change the behaviour, as earlier switching the bus
> width was optional. See the comment a few lines above and the
> implementation of mmc_select_bus_width().
Sorry, but I cannot see any behavioural change for bus width.
before swithing to HS400, we should make sure it's in 8-bit mode.
Before this change, the path seems to be:
(1) select_timing : hs200 --> mmc_select_hs200 -> mmc_select_bus_width
hs --> mmc_select_hs
(2) mmc_card_hs200 -> tuning --> mmc_select_hs400
mmc_card_hs -> mmc_select_bus_width -> mmc_select_hs_ddr
Now the behaviour should be:
(1) select_timing : hs400es -> mmc_select_hs
hs200 --> mmc_select_hs200 -> mmc_select_bus_width
hs --> mmc_select_hs
(2) mmc_card_hs200 -> tuning --> mmc_select_hs400
mmc_card_hs -> mmc_select_bus_width |-> mmc_select_hs_ddr
|-> mmc_select_hs400
did I miss something?
Thanks.
>
>> +
>> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
>> + /* Directly from HS to HS400-ES */
>> + err = mmc_select_hs400(card);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto free_card;
>> + } else {
>> err = mmc_select_hs_ddr(card);
>> if (err)
>> goto free_card;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> index eb0151b..22defc2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
>> u8 raw_partition_support; /* 160 */
>> u8 raw_rpmb_size_mult; /* 168 */
>> u8 raw_erased_mem_count; /* 181 */
>> + u8 strobe_support; /* 184 */
>> u8 raw_ext_csd_structure; /* 194 */
>> u8 raw_card_type; /* 196 */
>> u8 raw_driver_strength; /* 197 */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> index 11e89d3..19de56c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/mmc/core.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
>> +#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
>>
>> struct mmc_ios {
>> @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
>>
>> /* Prepare HS400 target operating frequency depending host driver */
>> int (*prepare_hs400_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios);
>> + /* Prepare enhanced strobe depending host driver */
>> + int (*prepare_enhanced_strobe)(struct mmc_host *host, bool enable);
>> int (*select_drive_strength)(struct mmc_card *card,
>> unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
>> int card_drv, int *drv_type);
>> @@ -518,6 +521,15 @@ static inline bool mmc_card_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
>> return card->host->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool mmc_card_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card)
>> +{
>> + if (mmc_card_hs400(card) &&
>> + (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> void mmc_retune_timer_stop(struct mmc_host *host);
>>
>> static inline void mmc_retune_needed(struct mmc_host *host)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>> index 15f2c4a..c376209 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>> @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
>> #define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG 179 /* R/W */
>> #define EXT_CSD_ERASED_MEM_CONT 181 /* RO */
>> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH 183 /* R/W */
>> +#define EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT 184 /* RO */
>> #define EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING 185 /* R/W */
>> #define EXT_CSD_POWER_CLASS 187 /* R/W */
>> #define EXT_CSD_REV 192 /* RO */
>> @@ -380,12 +381,14 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
>> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V (1<<7) /* Card can run at 200MHz DDR, 1.2V */
>> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 (EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V | \
>> EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V)
>> +#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES (1<<8) /* Card can run at HS400ES */
>>
>> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_1 0 /* Card is in 1 bit mode */
>> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4 1 /* Card is in 4 bit mode */
>> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8 2 /* Card is in 8 bit mode */
>> #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_4 5 /* Card is in 4 bit DDR mode */
>> #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 6 /* Card is in 8 bit DDR mode */
>> +#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE BIT(7) /* Enhanced strobe mode */
>>
>> #define EXT_CSD_TIMING_BC 0 /* Backwards compatility */
>> #define EXT_CSD_TIMING_HS 1 /* High speed */
>> --
>> 2.3.7
>>
>>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 14:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support |
| Message-ID | <rwSaC-5og-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390711 |
On 29/04/16 05:47, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Controllers use data strobe line to latch data from devices
> under hs400 mode, but not for cmd line. So since emmc 5.1, JEDEC
> introduces enhanced strobe mode for latching cmd response from
> emmc devices to host controllers. This new feature is optional,
> so it depends both on device's cap and host's cap to decide
> whether to use it or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Thanks for doing this. There are a couple of comments below, but generally
I tend to think you should split out selecting HS400ES as a separate function.
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +-
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 +
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 12 ++++++++
> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 3 ++
> 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
> index 4bc48f1..7e94b9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
> @@ -332,12 +332,13 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card)
> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
> type);
> } else {
> - pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
> + pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
> mmc_hostname(card->host),
> mmc_card_uhs(card) ? "ultra high speed " :
> (mmc_card_hs(card) ? "high speed " : ""),
> mmc_card_hs400(card) ? "HS400 " :
> (mmc_card_hs200(card) ? "HS200 " : ""),
> + mmc_card_hs400es(card) ? "Enhanced strobe" : "",
> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
> uhs_bus_speed_mode, type, card->rca);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> index 28b477d..f45ed10 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ static void mmc_select_card_type(struct mmc_card *card)
> avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V;
> }
>
> + if ((caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ENHANCED_STROBE) &&
> + card->ext_csd.strobe_support &&
> + ((card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V) ||
> + (card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V)))
Could use just "card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400" here
> + avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES;
> +
> card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = hs_max_dtr;
> card->ext_csd.hs200_max_dtr = hs200_max_dtr;
> card->mmc_avail_type = avail_type;
> @@ -383,6 +389,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd)
> mmc_card_set_blockaddr(card);
> }
>
> + card->ext_csd.strobe_support = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT];
> card->ext_csd.raw_card_type = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE];
> mmc_select_card_type(card);
>
> @@ -1062,9 +1069,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
> u8 val;
>
> /*
> - * HS400 mode requires 8-bit bus width
> + * HS400(ES) mode requires 8-bit bus width
> */
> - if (!(card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 &&
> + if (!(((card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400) ||
> + (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)) &&
> host->ios.bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -1097,9 +1105,26 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
> }
>
> /* Switch card to DDR */
> + val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8;
> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
> + val |= EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE;
> + /*
> + * Make sure we are in non-enhanced strobe mode before we
> + * actually enable it in ext_csd.
> + */
> + if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
> + err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, false);
> +
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("%s: unprepare_enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host), err);
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH,
> - EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8,
> + val,
> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
> if (err) {
> pr_err("%s: switch to bus width for hs400 failed, err:%d\n",
> @@ -1124,6 +1149,35 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
> mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400);
> mmc_set_bus_speed(card);
>
> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
> + /* Controller enable enhanced strobe function */
> + if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
> + err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, true);
> +
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("%s: prepare enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host), err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * After switching to hs400 enhanced strobe mode, we expect to
> + * verify whether it works or not. If controller can't handle
> + * bus width test, compare ext_csd previously read in 1 bit mode
> + * against ext_csd at new bus width
> + */
I don't think we need this. Just checking (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA)
ought to be enough. But if you want to play if safe, you could use
mmc_select_bus_width() in advance.
> + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST))
> + err = mmc_compare_ext_csds(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
> + else
> + err = mmc_bus_test(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
> +
> + if (err) {
> + pr_warn("%s: switch to enhanced strobe failed\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host));
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!send_status) {
> err = mmc_switch_status(card);
> if (err)
> @@ -1297,7 +1351,8 @@ err:
> }
>
> /*
> - * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported.
> + * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported. For HS400
> + * with enhanced strobe mode, we should activate High Speed.
> */
> static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
> {
> @@ -1306,7 +1361,9 @@ static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
> if (!mmc_can_ext_csd(card))
> goto bus_speed;
>
> - if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)
> + err = mmc_select_hs(card);
In my view, you should just make a new function: mmc_select_hs400es()
> + else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
> err = mmc_select_hs200(card);
> else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS)
> err = mmc_select_hs(card);
> @@ -1578,7 +1635,15 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> } else if (mmc_card_hs(card)) {
> /* Select the desired bus width optionally */
> err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
> - if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(err)) {
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(err))
> + goto free_card;
> +
> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
> + /* Directly from HS to HS400-ES */
> + err = mmc_select_hs400(card);
> + if (err)
> + goto free_card;
> + } else {
> err = mmc_select_hs_ddr(card);
> if (err)
> goto free_card;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> index eb0151b..22defc2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
> u8 raw_partition_support; /* 160 */
> u8 raw_rpmb_size_mult; /* 168 */
> u8 raw_erased_mem_count; /* 181 */
> + u8 strobe_support; /* 184 */
> u8 raw_ext_csd_structure; /* 194 */
> u8 raw_card_type; /* 196 */
> u8 raw_driver_strength; /* 197 */
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index 11e89d3..19de56c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/mmc/core.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
> +#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
>
> struct mmc_ios {
> @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
>
> /* Prepare HS400 target operating frequency depending host driver */
> int (*prepare_hs400_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> + /* Prepare enhanced strobe depending host driver */
> + int (*prepare_enhanced_strobe)(struct mmc_host *host, bool enable);
I don't see any need for an error return, so maybe make this return void.
Also, we could put "bool enhanced_strobe" in struct mmc_ios and pass ios
instead of enable.
> int (*select_drive_strength)(struct mmc_card *card,
> unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
> int card_drv, int *drv_type);
> @@ -518,6 +521,15 @@ static inline bool mmc_card_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
> return card->host->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400;
> }
>
> +static inline bool mmc_card_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card)
> +{
> + if (mmc_card_hs400(card) &&
> + (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES))
> + return 1;
We shouldn't assume that we are using it, just because it is available.
How about putting "bool enhanced_strobe" in struct mmc_ios and checking that.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> void mmc_retune_timer_stop(struct mmc_host *host);
>
> static inline void mmc_retune_needed(struct mmc_host *host)
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> index 15f2c4a..c376209 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
> @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
> #define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG 179 /* R/W */
> #define EXT_CSD_ERASED_MEM_CONT 181 /* RO */
> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH 183 /* R/W */
> +#define EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT 184 /* RO */
> #define EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING 185 /* R/W */
> #define EXT_CSD_POWER_CLASS 187 /* R/W */
> #define EXT_CSD_REV 192 /* RO */
> @@ -380,12 +381,14 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V (1<<7) /* Card can run at 200MHz DDR, 1.2V */
> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 (EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V | \
> EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V)
> +#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES (1<<8) /* Card can run at HS400ES */
>
> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_1 0 /* Card is in 1 bit mode */
> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4 1 /* Card is in 4 bit mode */
> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8 2 /* Card is in 8 bit mode */
> #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_4 5 /* Card is in 4 bit DDR mode */
> #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 6 /* Card is in 8 bit DDR mode */
> +#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE BIT(7) /* Enhanced strobe mode */
>
> #define EXT_CSD_TIMING_BC 0 /* Backwards compatility */
> #define EXT_CSD_TIMING_HS 1 /* High speed */
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@kernel-upstream.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 10:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support |
| Message-ID | <rxbmW-7dG-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1396986 |
On 2016/5/9 19:56, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 29/04/16 05:47, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> Controllers use data strobe line to latch data from devices
>> under hs400 mode, but not for cmd line. So since emmc 5.1, JEDEC
>> introduces enhanced strobe mode for latching cmd response from
>> emmc devices to host controllers. This new feature is optional,
>> so it depends both on device's cap and host's cap to decide
>> whether to use it or not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>
> Thanks for doing this. There are a couple of comments below, but generally
> I tend to think you should split out selecting HS400ES as a separate function.
>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>> drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 12 ++++++++
>> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 3 ++
>> 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> index 4bc48f1..7e94b9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> @@ -332,12 +332,13 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card)
>> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
>> type);
>> } else {
>> - pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
>> + pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
>> mmc_hostname(card->host),
>> mmc_card_uhs(card) ? "ultra high speed " :
>> (mmc_card_hs(card) ? "high speed " : ""),
>> mmc_card_hs400(card) ? "HS400 " :
>> (mmc_card_hs200(card) ? "HS200 " : ""),
>> + mmc_card_hs400es(card) ? "Enhanced strobe" : "",
>> mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
>> uhs_bus_speed_mode, type, card->rca);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> index 28b477d..f45ed10 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> @@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ static void mmc_select_card_type(struct mmc_card *card)
>> avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V;
>> }
>>
>> + if ((caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ENHANCED_STROBE) &&
>> + card->ext_csd.strobe_support &&
>> + ((card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V) ||
>> + (card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V)))
>
> Could use just "card_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400" here
okay, EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 contains 1_2V & 1_8V, so I will
use it.
>
>> + avail_type |= EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES;
>> +
>> card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = hs_max_dtr;
>> card->ext_csd.hs200_max_dtr = hs200_max_dtr;
>> card->mmc_avail_type = avail_type;
>> @@ -383,6 +389,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd)
>> mmc_card_set_blockaddr(card);
>> }
>>
>> + card->ext_csd.strobe_support = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT];
>> card->ext_csd.raw_card_type = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE];
>> mmc_select_card_type(card);
>>
>> @@ -1062,9 +1069,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
>> u8 val;
>>
>> /*
>> - * HS400 mode requires 8-bit bus width
>> + * HS400(ES) mode requires 8-bit bus width
>> */
>> - if (!(card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 &&
>> + if (!(((card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400) ||
>> + (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)) &&
>> host->ios.bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8))
>> return 0;
>>
>> @@ -1097,9 +1105,26 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
>> }
>>
>> /* Switch card to DDR */
>> + val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8;
>> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
>> + val |= EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE;
>> + /*
>> + * Make sure we are in non-enhanced strobe mode before we
>> + * actually enable it in ext_csd.
>> + */
>> + if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
>> + err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, false);
>> +
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_err("%s: unprepare_enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
>> + mmc_hostname(host), err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>> EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH,
>> - EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8,
>> + val,
>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
>> if (err) {
>> pr_err("%s: switch to bus width for hs400 failed, err:%d\n",
>> @@ -1124,6 +1149,35 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
>> mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400);
>> mmc_set_bus_speed(card);
>>
>> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
>> + /* Controller enable enhanced strobe function */
>> + if (host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe)
>> + err = host->ops->prepare_enhanced_strobe(host, true);
>> +
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_err("%s: prepare enhanced strobe failed, err:%d\n",
>> + mmc_hostname(host), err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * After switching to hs400 enhanced strobe mode, we expect to
>> + * verify whether it works or not. If controller can't handle
>> + * bus width test, compare ext_csd previously read in 1 bit mode
>> + * against ext_csd at new bus width
>> + */
>
> I don't think we need this. Just checking (host->caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA)
> ought to be enough. But if you want to play if safe, you could use
> mmc_select_bus_width() in advance.
Ulf also questioned the requirment of doing this.
I consider droping this checking for the next version.
>
>> + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST))
>> + err = mmc_compare_ext_csds(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
>> + else
>> + err = mmc_bus_test(card, MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8);
>> +
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_warn("%s: switch to enhanced strobe failed\n",
>> + mmc_hostname(host));
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!send_status) {
>> err = mmc_switch_status(card);
>> if (err)
>> @@ -1297,7 +1351,8 @@ err:
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported.
>> + * Activate High Speed or HS200 mode if supported. For HS400
>> + * with enhanced strobe mode, we should activate High Speed.
>> */
>> static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
>> {
>> @@ -1306,7 +1361,9 @@ static int mmc_select_timing(struct mmc_card *card)
>> if (!mmc_can_ext_csd(card))
>> goto bus_speed;
>>
>> - if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
>> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES)
>> + err = mmc_select_hs(card);
>
> In my view, you should just make a new function: mmc_select_hs400es()
I will spilt a new function to handle the hs400es timing slection.
>
>> + else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS200)
>> err = mmc_select_hs200(card);
>> else if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS)
>> err = mmc_select_hs(card);
>> @@ -1578,7 +1635,15 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
>> } else if (mmc_card_hs(card)) {
>> /* Select the desired bus width optionally */
>> err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
>> - if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(err)) {
>> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(err))
>> + goto free_card;
>> +
>> + if (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES) {
>> + /* Directly from HS to HS400-ES */
>> + err = mmc_select_hs400(card);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto free_card;
>> + } else {
>> err = mmc_select_hs_ddr(card);
>> if (err)
>> goto free_card;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> index eb0151b..22defc2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
>> u8 raw_partition_support; /* 160 */
>> u8 raw_rpmb_size_mult; /* 168 */
>> u8 raw_erased_mem_count; /* 181 */
>> + u8 strobe_support; /* 184 */
>> u8 raw_ext_csd_structure; /* 194 */
>> u8 raw_card_type; /* 196 */
>> u8 raw_driver_strength; /* 197 */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> index 11e89d3..19de56c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/mmc/core.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
>> +#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
>>
>> struct mmc_ios {
>> @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
>>
>> /* Prepare HS400 target operating frequency depending host driver */
>> int (*prepare_hs400_tuning)(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios);
>> + /* Prepare enhanced strobe depending host driver */
>> + int (*prepare_enhanced_strobe)(struct mmc_host *host, bool enable);
>
> I don't see any need for an error return, so maybe make this return void.
> Also, we could put "bool enhanced_strobe" in struct mmc_ios and pass ios
> instead of enable.
yep, currently there's no need to check it.
I will change the name to hs400_enhacned_strobe as Ulf's suggestion,
and pass mmc_ios to this callback as well.
>
>> int (*select_drive_strength)(struct mmc_card *card,
>> unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
>> int card_drv, int *drv_type);
>> @@ -518,6 +521,15 @@ static inline bool mmc_card_hs400(struct mmc_card *card)
>> return card->host->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool mmc_card_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card)
>> +{
>> + if (mmc_card_hs400(card) &&
>> + (card->mmc_avail_type & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES))
>> + return 1;
>
> We shouldn't assume that we are using it, just because it is available.
> How about putting "bool enhanced_strobe" in struct mmc_ios and checking that.
>
Good catch. Thanks.
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> void mmc_retune_timer_stop(struct mmc_host *host);
>>
>> static inline void mmc_retune_needed(struct mmc_host *host)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>> index 15f2c4a..c376209 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>> @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
>> #define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG 179 /* R/W */
>> #define EXT_CSD_ERASED_MEM_CONT 181 /* RO */
>> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH 183 /* R/W */
>> +#define EXT_CSD_STROBE_SUPPORT 184 /* RO */
>> #define EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING 185 /* R/W */
>> #define EXT_CSD_POWER_CLASS 187 /* R/W */
>> #define EXT_CSD_REV 192 /* RO */
>> @@ -380,12 +381,14 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
>> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V (1<<7) /* Card can run at 200MHz DDR, 1.2V */
>> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400 (EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_8V | \
>> EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400_1_2V)
>> +#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_HS400ES (1<<8) /* Card can run at HS400ES */
>>
>> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_1 0 /* Card is in 1 bit mode */
>> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4 1 /* Card is in 4 bit mode */
>> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_8 2 /* Card is in 8 bit mode */
>> #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_4 5 /* Card is in 4 bit DDR mode */
>> #define EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 6 /* Card is in 8 bit DDR mode */
>> +#define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE BIT(7) /* Enhanced strobe mode */
>>
>> #define EXT_CSD_TIMING_BC 0 /* Backwards compatility */
>> #define EXT_CSD_TIMING_HS 1 /* High speed */
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 05:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 1/6] Documentation: mmc: add mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe |
| Message-ID | <rt6Yx-7h3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390710 |
mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe is used to claim that the host can support hs400 mode with enhanced strobe introduced by emmc 5.1 spec. Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> --- Changes in v2: None Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt index ed23b9b..ecc007a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Optional properties: - mmc-hs200-1_2v: eMMC HS200 mode(1.2V I/O) is supported - mmc-hs400-1_8v: eMMC HS400 mode(1.8V I/O) is supported - mmc-hs400-1_2v: eMMC HS400 mode(1.2V I/O) is supported +- mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe: eMMC HS400 enhanced strobe mode is supported - dsr: Value the card's (optional) Driver Stage Register (DSR) should be programmed with. Valid range: [0 .. 0xffff]. -- 2.3.7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 19:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] Documentation: mmc: add mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe |
| Message-ID | <ruLZE-3wI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390712 |
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:46:00AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: > mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe is used to claim that the > host can support hs400 mode with enhanced strobe > introduced by emmc 5.1 spec. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: None > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web