Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1391231 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-29 17:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-10 03:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 on this page of 22 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH perf/core v2 0/8] perf tools: Update strbuf to remove xrealloc Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:10 +0200
[PATCH perf/core v2 2/8] perf probe: Check the return value of strbuf APIs Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 2/8] perf probe: Check the return value of strbuf APIs Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 2/8] perf probe: Check the return value of strbuf APIs Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-05-10 04:40 +0200
[PATCH perf/core v2 5/8] perf header: Make topology checkers to check return value of strbuf Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 5/8] perf header: Make topology checkers to check return value of strbuf Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 5/8] perf header: Make topology checkers to check return value of strbuf Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-05-10 05:00 +0200
[PATCH perf/core v2 8/8] perf tools: Remove xrealloc and ALLOC_GROW Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 8/8] perf tools: Remove xrealloc and ALLOC_GROW Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 02:00 +0200
[PATCH perf/core v2 3/8] perf help: Make check_emacsclient_version to check strbuf APIs Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 3/8] perf help: Make check_emacsclient_version to check strbuf APIs Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 02:00 +0200
[PATCH perf/core v2 4/8] perf: Make alias handler to check return value of strbuf Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 4/8] perf: Make alias handler to check return value of strbuf Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 02:00 +0200
[PATCH perf/core v2 6/8] perf pmu: Make pmu_formats_string to check return value of strbuf Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 6/8] perf pmu: Make pmu_formats_string to check return value of strbuf Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 02:00 +0200
[PATCH perf/core v2 7/8] perf help: Do not use ALLOC_GROW in add_cmd_list Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 7/8] perf help: Do not use ALLOC_GROW in add_cmd_list Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 0/8] perf tools: Update strbuf to remove xrealloc Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
[PATCH perf/core v2 1/8] perf: Rewrite strbuf not to die Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 1/8] perf: Rewrite strbuf not to die Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 1/8] perf: Rewrite strbuf not to die Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 1/8] perf: Rewrite strbuf not to die Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2016-05-10 03:10 +0200
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-06 01:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 1/8] perf: Rewrite strbuf not to die |
| Message-ID | <rvBbQ-1tA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1395480 |
Em Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:25:38PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:09:50AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > > @@ -112,12 +151,14 @@ ssize_t strbuf_read(struct strbuf *sb, int fd, ssize_t hint) > > strbuf_release(sb); > > else > > strbuf_setlen(sb, oldlen); > > - return -1; > > + return cnt; > > This is unrelated, no? > > I.e. this _was_ already returning a failure code, but then you are > propagating the read() return, which may even be a good idea, haven't > thought about that, but is unrelated to what this patch is doing, please > put it in a separate patch if you think it is a good idea. > > All the rest seems ok, going over the other patches now. Just a bit annoying, but this is done when checking if cnt < 0, which can only be -1 as per read's man page, so its ok, nevermind... - Arnaldo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 03:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH perf/core v2 1/8] perf: Rewrite strbuf not to die |
| Message-ID | <rx4ls-tZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1395480 |
On Thu, 5 May 2016 20:25:38 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> Em Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:09:50AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > Rewrite strbuf implementation not to use die() nor xrealloc().
> > Instead of die, now most of the API returns error code or 0 if
> > succeeded.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/strbuf.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > tools/perf/util/strbuf.h | 25 +++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c b/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c
> > index 8fb7329..a98bb60 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > +#include "debug.h"
> > #include "cache.h"
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >
> > @@ -17,12 +18,13 @@ int prefixcmp(const char *str, const char *prefix)
> > */
> > char strbuf_slopbuf[1];
> >
> > -void strbuf_init(struct strbuf *sb, ssize_t hint)
> > +int strbuf_init(struct strbuf *sb, ssize_t hint)
> > {
> > sb->alloc = sb->len = 0;
> > sb->buf = strbuf_slopbuf;
> > if (hint)
> > - strbuf_grow(sb, hint);
> > + return strbuf_grow(sb, hint);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > void strbuf_release(struct strbuf *sb)
> > @@ -42,67 +44,104 @@ char *strbuf_detach(struct strbuf *sb, size_t *sz)
> > return res;
> > }
> >
> > -void strbuf_grow(struct strbuf *sb, size_t extra)
> > +int strbuf_grow(struct strbuf *sb, size_t extra)
> > {
> > - if (sb->len + extra + 1 <= sb->len)
> > - die("you want to use way too much memory");
> > - if (!sb->alloc)
> > - sb->buf = NULL;
> > - ALLOC_GROW(sb->buf, sb->len + extra + 1, sb->alloc);
> > + char *buf;
> > + size_t nr = sb->len + extra + 1;
> > +
> > + if (nr < sb->alloc)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (nr <= sb->len)
> > + return -E2BIG;
> > +
> > + if (alloc_nr(sb->alloc) > nr)
> > + nr = alloc_nr(sb->alloc);
> > +
> > + buf = malloc(nr * sizeof(*buf));
> > + if (!buf)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + if (sb->alloc) {
> > + memcpy(buf, sb->buf, sb->alloc);
> > + free(sb->buf);
> > + }
>
> Why not use realloc? I.e. as the old code did, the problem was not that,
> was just the panic when the realloc operation fails, that you are
> removing here.
Oops, right. it seems I misunderstood the return value of realloc.
>
> I.e. the above would be:
>
> buf = realloc(sb->buf, nr * sizeof(*buf));
> if (!buf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> > + sb->buf = buf;
> > + sb->alloc = nr;
> > + return 0;
>
> I.e. no need to do the memcpy() nor the free(), no?
Yes, agreed.
I'll update to do so.
Thanks!
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web