Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1396174 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-07 01:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-10 00:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] clk: mediatek: Add config options for MT2701 subsystem clocks Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-05-07 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] clk: mediatek: Add config options for MT2701 subsystem clocks James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> - 2016-05-09 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] clk: mediatek: Add config options for MT2701 subsystem clocks Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-05-10 00:20 +0200
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-07 01:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] clk: mediatek: Add config options for MT2701 subsystem clocks |
| Message-ID | <rvX2G-64J-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 04/14, James Liao wrote: > MT2701 subsystem clocks are optional and should be enabled only if > their subsystem drivers are ready to control these clocks. > > Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> > --- Why is this patch split off from the patch that introduces the file? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rwM5b-6dE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1396174 |
HI Stephen, On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:02 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/14, James Liao wrote: > > MT2701 subsystem clocks are optional and should be enabled only if > > their subsystem drivers are ready to control these clocks. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> > > --- > > Why is this patch split off from the patch that introduces the > file? I was looking for comments about how to make subsystem clocks optional. So I used a separated patch to do it. Is it an acceptable way to use config options to enable subsystem clock support? Best regards, James
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rx1GX-6f0-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1396594 |
On 05/09, James Liao wrote: > HI Stephen, > > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:02 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 04/14, James Liao wrote: > > > MT2701 subsystem clocks are optional and should be enabled only if > > > their subsystem drivers are ready to control these clocks. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> > > > --- > > > > Why is this patch split off from the patch that introduces the > > file? > > I was looking for comments about how to make subsystem clocks optional. > So I used a separated patch to do it. Is it an acceptable way to use > config options to enable subsystem clock support? > Yes config options are fine. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web