Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1396920 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Edd Barrett <edd@theunixzoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-09 12:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-09 12:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Odd interaction between tasket and isolated cores (3.16.x) Edd Barrett <edd@theunixzoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-09 12:40 +0200
| From | Edd Barrett <edd@theunixzoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 12:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Odd interaction between tasket and isolated cores (3.16.x) |
| Message-ID | <rwQLw-3GP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, I'm experiencing an unexpected behaviour regarding thread scheduling on 3.16.x kernels. What I am trying to do is: run multithreaded benchmarks on a set of isolated cores and have threads balance over the isolated cores. My approach is to boot with an isolcpus kernel argument, then use taskset with an affinity mask so as to force benchmarks onto the isolated set of cores. However, I have found that all threads get bound to one core. Since this is not the case if you don't use taskset, or use a realtime scheduling policy, I tend to think this is a bug, but I am not sure. I've raised a bug here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116701 Bug description contains a test case and detailed instructions to reproduce. I've also used systemtap to hone in on the troublesome section of code. I think it's to do with affine wake, but I'm not sure. I'd be interested to hear what people think about this. If this is expected behaviour, is there a way to disable affine wakes? Thanks -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web