Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1396838 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-09 10:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-10 19:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> - 2016-05-09 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-05-10 19:30 +0200
| From | Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 10:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions |
| Message-ID | <rwOA2-1jg-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 21.04.2016 11:25, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 21:18, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc,
>> I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with kvm-pr,
>> while it is fine with kvm-hv.
>>
>> When an illegal instruction (like ".long 0") is processed by kvm-pr,
>> the kernel logs are filled with:
>>
>> Couldn't emulate instruction 0x00000000 (op 0 xop 0)
>> kvmppc_handle_exit_pr: emulation at 700 failed (00000000)
>>
>> While the exception handler receives an interrupt for each instruction
>> executed after the illegal instruction.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>> index 2afdb9c..4ee969d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>> @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>
>> switch (get_op(inst)) {
>> case 0:
>> - emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
>> if ((kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_LE) &&
>> (inst == swab32(inst_sc))) {
>> /*
>> @@ -112,6 +111,9 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, 3, EV_UNIMPLEMENTED);
>> kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) + 4);
>> emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
>> + } else {
>> + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
>> + emulated = EMULATE_AGAIN;
>> }
>> break;
>> case 19:
>>
>
> Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Ping!
Alex, Paul, could you please pick up this patch? This patch is required
to get the kvm-unit-tests working properly with kvm-pr, so I'd be glad
if we could get this included finally...
Thanks,
Thomas
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rxjDQ-75T-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1396838 |
On 09/05/2016 10:14, Thomas Huth wrote: >> > Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > Ping! > > Alex, Paul, could you please pick up this patch? This patch is required > to get the kvm-unit-tests working properly with kvm-pr, so I'd be glad > if we could get this included finally... I have a pull request for 4.6 final to send tomorrow; do you want me to include it? Thanks, Paolo
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web