Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1396547 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v5 05/12] zsmalloc: use bit_spin_lock

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH v5 05/12] zsmalloc: use bit_spin_lock Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-05-09 04:30 +0200

#1396547 — [PATCH v5 05/12] zsmalloc: use bit_spin_lock

Use kernel standard bit spin-lock instead of custom mess. Even, it has
a bug which doesn't disable preemption. The reason we don't have any
problem is that we have used it during preemption disable section
by class->lock spinlock. So no need to go to stable.

Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
 mm/zsmalloc.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index 3c2574be8cee..718dde7fd028 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -867,21 +867,17 @@ static unsigned long obj_idx_to_offset(struct page *page,
 
 static inline int trypin_tag(unsigned long handle)
 {
-	unsigned long *ptr = (unsigned long *)handle;
-
-	return !test_and_set_bit_lock(HANDLE_PIN_BIT, ptr);
+	return bit_spin_trylock(HANDLE_PIN_BIT, (unsigned long *)handle);
 }
 
 static void pin_tag(unsigned long handle)
 {
-	while (!trypin_tag(handle));
+	bit_spin_lock(HANDLE_PIN_BIT, (unsigned long *)handle);
 }
 
 static void unpin_tag(unsigned long handle)
 {
-	unsigned long *ptr = (unsigned long *)handle;
-
-	clear_bit_unlock(HANDLE_PIN_BIT, ptr);
+	bit_spin_unlock(HANDLE_PIN_BIT, (unsigned long *)handle);
 }
 
 static void reset_page(struct page *page)
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web