Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1395057 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-05 14:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-05 14:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCHv8 1/2] x86/vdso: add mremap hook to vm_special_mapping Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-05 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCHv8 1/2] x86/vdso: add mremap hook to vm_special_mapping Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-05-05 14:00 +0200
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-05 14:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCHv8 1/2] x86/vdso: add mremap hook to vm_special_mapping |
| Message-ID | <rvq6J-7IA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
* Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > On 04/26/2016 12:38 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > >>Add possibility for userspace 32-bit applications to move > >>vdso mapping. Previously, when userspace app called > >>mremap for vdso, in return path it would land on previous > >>address of vdso page, resulting in segmentation violation. > >>Now it lands fine and returns to userspace with remapped vdso. > >>This will also fix context.vdso pointer for 64-bit, which does not > >>affect the user of vdso after mremap by now, but this may change. > >> > >>As suggested by Andy, return EINVAL for mremap that splits vdso image. > >> > >>Renamed and moved text_mapping structure declaration inside > >>map_vdso, as it used only there and now it complement > >>vvar_mapping variable. > >> > >>There is still problem for remapping vdso in glibc applications: > >>linker relocates addresses for syscalls on vdso page, so > >>you need to relink with the new addresses. Or the next syscall > >>through glibc may fail: > >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > >> #0 0xf7fd9b80 in __kernel_vsyscall () > >> #1 0xf7ec8238 in _exit () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 > >Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> > > > >Ingo, can you apply this? > > Hm, so I'm not sure - should I resend those two? > Or just ping? Please send a clean series with updated Acked-by's, etc. Thanks! Ingo
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-05 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rvq6K-7IA-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1395057 |
On 05/05/2016 02:52 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > >> On 04/26/2016 12:38 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> wrote: >>>> Add possibility for userspace 32-bit applications to move >>>> vdso mapping. Previously, when userspace app called >>>> mremap for vdso, in return path it would land on previous >>>> address of vdso page, resulting in segmentation violation. >>>> Now it lands fine and returns to userspace with remapped vdso. >>>> This will also fix context.vdso pointer for 64-bit, which does not >>>> affect the user of vdso after mremap by now, but this may change. >>>> >>>> As suggested by Andy, return EINVAL for mremap that splits vdso image. >>>> >>>> Renamed and moved text_mapping structure declaration inside >>>> map_vdso, as it used only there and now it complement >>>> vvar_mapping variable. >>>> >>>> There is still problem for remapping vdso in glibc applications: >>>> linker relocates addresses for syscalls on vdso page, so >>>> you need to relink with the new addresses. Or the next syscall >>>> through glibc may fail: >>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>>> #0 0xf7fd9b80 in __kernel_vsyscall () >>>> #1 0xf7ec8238 in _exit () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 >>> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> >>> >>> Ingo, can you apply this? >> >> Hm, so I'm not sure - should I resend those two? >> Or just ping? > > Please send a clean series with updated Acked-by's, etc. Thanks, Ingo, will do. Sorry for html in the last email - mail agent got an update and I overlooked html composing become turned on. -- Regards, Dmitry Safonov
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web