Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1392312 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode/amd: Do not overwrite specific patch levels

Started byBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
First post2016-05-02 17:40 +0200
Last post2016-05-06 15:30 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode/amd: Do not overwrite specific patch  levels Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-05-02 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode/amd: Do not overwrite specific patch  levels Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> - 2016-05-06 14:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode/amd: Do not overwrite specific patch  levels Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-05-06 15:30 +0200

#1392312 — Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode/amd: Do not overwrite specific patch levels

FromBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date2016-05-02 17:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] x86/microcode/amd: Do not overwrite specific patch levels
Message-ID<ruo70-61q-23@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 05:47:48PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> But ok. I'll put it on my TODO, will get to it eventually. Unless you
> beat me to it... :)

Ok, I'm attaching the backports for 3.2. Care to give them a run too,
just in case? Seem to work here on my test box...

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1395838

FromHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Date2016-05-06 14:50 +0200
Message-ID<rvNmG-5ee-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1392312
On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 12:30, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 05:47:48PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > But ok. I'll put it on my TODO, will get to it eventually. Unless you
> > beat me to it... :)
> 
> Ok, I'm attaching the backports for 3.2. Care to give them a run too,
> just in case? Seem to work here on my test box...

Unfortunately, I don't have any AMD boxes on hand to runtime-test them,
which would be the reason why I didn't try backporting these on my own
:-(

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1395864

FromBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date2016-05-06 15:30 +0200
Message-ID<rvNZo-64k-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1395838
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:43:47AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Unfortunately, I don't have any AMD boxes on hand to runtime-test them,
> which would be the reason why I didn't try backporting these on my own
> :-(

Ok, no probs. I'll send them to stable.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web