Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1392415 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] Make clocksource insert entry more efficiently

Started byJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
First post2016-05-02 19:50 +0200
Last post2016-05-03 05:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] Make clocksource insert entry more efficiently John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-05-02 19:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] Make clocksource insert entry more efficiently Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 05:40 +0200

#1392415 — Re: [PATCH] Make clocksource insert entry more efficiently

FromJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date2016-05-02 19:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Make clocksource insert entry more efficiently
Message-ID<ruq8Q-7OL-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is unnecessary to continue looping the list, if we find there is an
> entry that the value of rating is smaller than the new one. It is safe
> to be out the loop, because all of entry are inserted in descending
> order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
> ---

Thanks for sending this in. It looks reasonable to me, though not
likely to gain a ton, as these are usually short lists, and we only
really tinker with them at bootup. But yea. I'll put it on my toqueue
list for testing.

Its maybe a little close to make it for 4.7, but we'll see.

Thanks again!
-john

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1393013

FromMinfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
Date2016-05-03 05:40 +0200
Message-ID<ruzlL-ir-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1392415
On 05/02/16 at 10:39P, John Stultz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It is unnecessary to continue looping the list, if we find there is an
> > entry that the value of rating is smaller than the new one. It is safe
> > to be out the loop, because all of entry are inserted in descending
> > order.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
> > ---
> 
> Thanks for sending this in. It looks reasonable to me, though not
> likely to gain a ton, as these are usually short lists, and we only
> really tinker with them at bootup. But yea. I'll put it on my toqueue
> list for testing.
> 
> Its maybe a little close to make it for 4.7, but we'll see.
> 
> Thanks again!
> -john

Thanks

Minfei

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web