Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1392033 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-02 09:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-03 22:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: mainline build: 896 warnings 1 failures (mainline/v4.6-rc5-224-gda9373d) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-02 09:30 +0200
Re: mainline build: 896 warnings 1 failures (mainline/v4.6-rc5-224-gda9373d) Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-05-03 04:20 +0200
Re: mainline build: 896 warnings 1 failures (mainline/v4.6-rc5-224-gda9373d) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-03 22:20 +0200
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-02 09:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: mainline build: 896 warnings 1 failures (mainline/v4.6-rc5-224-gda9373d) |
| Message-ID | <rugsO-7Dm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sunday 01 May 2016 16:19:53 Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Olof's autobuilder <build@lixom.net> wrote: > > Here are the build results from automated periodic testing. > > > > The tree being built was mainline, found at: > > > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git (master branch) > > > > Topmost commit: > > > > da9373d Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal > > > > Build logs (stderr only) can be found at the following link (experimental): > > > > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/mainline/v4.6-rc5-224-gda9373d/ > > > > > > Runtime: 5m 0s > > > > Passed: 117 > > Failed: 1 > > > > Warnings: 896 > > > > Section mismatches: 0 > > So, yeah, I updated to GCC 6.1.0 and it looks noisy. If it doesn't get > whittled down pretty quickly I might switch to an older compiler > again. Oops, it looks like I never submitted a patch to shut up -Wunused-const-variable, though I've been building that way myself here and fixing all /other/ warnings. I think we want to have -Wunused-const-variable at the W=1 level, but not by default. Arnd
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ruy6m-7Dk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1392033 |
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2016 16:19:53 Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Olof's autobuilder <build@lixom.net> wrote: >> > Here are the build results from automated periodic testing. >> > >> > The tree being built was mainline, found at: >> > >> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git (master branch) >> > >> > Topmost commit: >> > >> > da9373d Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal >> > >> > Build logs (stderr only) can be found at the following link (experimental): >> > >> > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/mainline/v4.6-rc5-224-gda9373d/ >> > >> > >> > Runtime: 5m 0s >> > >> > Passed: 117 >> > Failed: 1 >> > >> > Warnings: 896 >> > >> > Section mismatches: 0 >> >> So, yeah, I updated to GCC 6.1.0 and it looks noisy. If it doesn't get >> whittled down pretty quickly I might switch to an older compiler >> again. > > Oops, it looks like I never submitted a patch to shut up > -Wunused-const-variable, though I've been building that way > myself here and fixing all /other/ warnings. > > I think we want to have -Wunused-const-variable at the W=1 level, but > not by default. Agreed, at least as long as it is as noisy as it is today. Care to send it in so we can see it in 4.6? -Olof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ruOXv-6su-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1392989 |
On Monday 02 May 2016 19:12:31 Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Sunday 01 May 2016 16:19:53 Olof Johansson wrote: > >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Olof's autobuilder <build@lixom.net> wrote: > >> > Here are the build results from automated periodic testing. > >> > > >> > The tree being built was mainline, found at: > >> > > >> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git (master branch) > >> > > >> > Topmost commit: > >> > > >> > da9373d Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal > >> > > >> > Build logs (stderr only) can be found at the following link (experimental): > >> > > >> > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/mainline/v4.6-rc5-224-gda9373d/ > >> > > >> > > >> > Runtime: 5m 0s > >> > > >> > Passed: 117 > >> > Failed: 1 > >> > > >> > Warnings: 896 > >> > > >> > Section mismatches: 0 > >> > >> So, yeah, I updated to GCC 6.1.0 and it looks noisy. If it doesn't get > >> whittled down pretty quickly I might switch to an older compiler > >> again. > > > > Oops, it looks like I never submitted a patch to shut up > > -Wunused-const-variable, though I've been building that way > > myself here and fixing all /other/ warnings. > > > > I think we want to have -Wunused-const-variable at the W=1 level, but > > not by default. > > Agreed, at least as long as it is as noisy as it is today. > > Care to send it in so we can see it in 4.6? Sure, I'll try. I seem to have a low success rate getting Makefile changes like this merged: My best guess is that Michal Marek should pick them up, but he ignored my last few submission for warning changes, so I don't know if I should instead send them to Andrew Morton or someone else. Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web