Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1393030 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-03 06:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-03 22:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-05-03 06:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-05-03 22:10 +0200
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 06:30 +0200 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree |
| Message-ID | <ruA8a-15s-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Jens,
Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
between commit:
9bf2b972afea ("NVMe: Fix reset/remove race")
from Linus' tree and commit:
bb8d261e0888 ("nvme: introduce a controller state machine")
from the block tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index 4fd733ff72b1,077e9bf6a1b8..000000000000
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@@ -1864,10 -1789,8 +1789,11 @@@ static void nvme_reset_work(struct work
if (dev->ctrl.ctrl_config & NVME_CC_ENABLE)
nvme_dev_disable(dev, false);
- if (test_bit(NVME_CTRL_REMOVING, &dev->flags))
++ if (dev->ctrl.state != NVME_CTRL_DELETING)
+ goto out;
+
- set_bit(NVME_CTRL_RESETTING, &dev->flags);
+ if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(&dev->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_RESETTING))
+ goto out;
result = nvme_pci_enable(dev);
if (result)
@@@ -2086,12 -2014,11 +2017,10 @@@ static void nvme_remove(struct pci_dev
{
struct nvme_dev *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
- set_bit(NVME_CTRL_REMOVING, &dev->flags);
- del_timer_sync(&dev->watchdog_timer);
-
+ nvme_change_ctrl_state(&dev->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_DELETING);
+
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
- flush_work(&dev->async_work);
+ flush_work(&dev->reset_work);
- flush_work(&dev->scan_work);
- nvme_remove_namespaces(&dev->ctrl);
nvme_uninit_ctrl(&dev->ctrl);
nvme_dev_disable(dev, true);
flush_work(&dev->reset_work);
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ruONP-6p2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1393030 |
On 05/02/2016 10:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 9bf2b972afea ("NVMe: Fix reset/remove race")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> bb8d261e0888 ("nvme: introduce a controller state machine")
>
> from the block tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
There's a proper fixup in my for-next now, so you should be able to drop
this one.
--
Jens Axboe
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web