Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1393423 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings

Started byDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
First post2016-05-03 15:50 +0200
Last post2016-05-03 15:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-05-03 15:50 +0200

#1393423 — Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings

FromDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date2016-05-03 15:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings
Message-ID<ruIS5-Hw-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 01:05:56PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The interrupt framework gives a lot of information about each interrupt.
> 
> It does not keep track of when those interrupts occur though.
> 
> This patch provides a mean to record the elapsed time between successive
> interrupt occurrences in a per-IRQ per-CPU circular buffer to help with the
> prediction of the next occurrence using a statistical model.
> 
> A new function is added to browse the different interrupts and retrieve the
> timing information stored in it.
> 
> A static key is introduced so when the irq prediction is switched off at
> runtime, we can reduce the overhead near to zero. The irq timings is
> supposed to be potentially used by different sub-systems and for this reason
> the static key is a ref counter, so when the last use releases the irq
> timings that will result on the effective deactivation of the irq measurement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
> ---
> V4:
>   - Added a static key
>   - Added more comments for irq_timings_get_next()
>   - Unified some function names to be prefixed by 'irq_timings_...'
>   - Fixed a rebase error

Hi Thomas,

I believe all the comments were addressed.

I can imagine you are very busy at the moment. Is there something else I 
should fix or is the patch ok for you ?

Thanks.

  -- Daniel

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web