Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1391863 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3] char/rtc: replace blacklist with whitelist

Started byGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2016-05-01 22:30 +0200
Last post2016-05-01 23:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3] char/rtc: replace blacklist with whitelist Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-05-01 22:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] char/rtc: replace blacklist with whitelist Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-01 23:00 +0200

#1391863 — Re: [PATCH v3] char/rtc: replace blacklist with whitelist

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-05-01 22:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] char/rtc: replace blacklist with whitelist
Message-ID<ru6a6-7if-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Every new architecture has to add itself to the growing list of those
> that do not support the legacy PC RTC driver.
> 
> This replaces the long list of architectures that don't support it
> with a shorter list of those that do.
> 
> The list is taken from those architectures that have a non-empty
> asm/mc146818rtc.h header file and were not explicitly blacklisted
> or select RTC_LIB.
> 
> Alpha and Loongson64 can already choose between this driver and
> an rtc-class based one. mn10300 is actually the only architecture
> now that still requires this driver, and that should be fairly
> easy to change to use rtc-cmos if we want to kill off rtc.ko
> for good.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> This time I've trimmed down the whitelist even more, and separate
> the patch from the other ones that are now all about the GEN_RTC
> driver.

So this is safe to take on it's own and you are going to redo that
larger series?

confused,

greg k-h

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1391880

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-05-01 23:00 +0200
Message-ID<ru6D9-7yr-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1391863
On Sunday 01 May 2016 13:21:07 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Every new architecture has to add itself to the growing list of those
> > that do not support the legacy PC RTC driver.
> > 
> > This replaces the long list of architectures that don't support it
> > with a shorter list of those that do.
> > 
> > The list is taken from those architectures that have a non-empty
> > asm/mc146818rtc.h header file and were not explicitly blacklisted
> > or select RTC_LIB.
> > 
> > Alpha and Loongson64 can already choose between this driver and
> > an rtc-class based one. mn10300 is actually the only architecture
> > now that still requires this driver, and that should be fairly
> > easy to change to use rtc-cmos if we want to kill off rtc.ko
> > for good.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > This time I've trimmed down the whitelist even more, and separate
> > the patch from the other ones that are now all about the GEN_RTC
> > driver.
> 
> So this is safe to take on it's own and you are going to redo that
> larger series?

What I tried to say here is that this patch is now completely
independent from the longer series, please apply it directly.

	Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web