Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1391863 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-01 22:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-01 23:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3] char/rtc: replace blacklist with whitelist Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-05-01 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] char/rtc: replace blacklist with whitelist Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-01 23:00 +0200
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 22:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] char/rtc: replace blacklist with whitelist |
| Message-ID | <ru6a6-7if-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Every new architecture has to add itself to the growing list of those > that do not support the legacy PC RTC driver. > > This replaces the long list of architectures that don't support it > with a shorter list of those that do. > > The list is taken from those architectures that have a non-empty > asm/mc146818rtc.h header file and were not explicitly blacklisted > or select RTC_LIB. > > Alpha and Loongson64 can already choose between this driver and > an rtc-class based one. mn10300 is actually the only architecture > now that still requires this driver, and that should be fairly > easy to change to use rtc-cmos if we want to kill off rtc.ko > for good. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> > --- > This time I've trimmed down the whitelist even more, and separate > the patch from the other ones that are now all about the GEN_RTC > driver. So this is safe to take on it's own and you are going to redo that larger series? confused, greg k-h
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 23:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ru6D9-7yr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1391863 |
On Sunday 01 May 2016 13:21:07 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Every new architecture has to add itself to the growing list of those > > that do not support the legacy PC RTC driver. > > > > This replaces the long list of architectures that don't support it > > with a shorter list of those that do. > > > > The list is taken from those architectures that have a non-empty > > asm/mc146818rtc.h header file and were not explicitly blacklisted > > or select RTC_LIB. > > > > Alpha and Loongson64 can already choose between this driver and > > an rtc-class based one. mn10300 is actually the only architecture > > now that still requires this driver, and that should be fairly > > easy to change to use rtc-cmos if we want to kill off rtc.ko > > for good. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> > > --- > > This time I've trimmed down the whitelist even more, and separate > > the patch from the other ones that are now all about the GEN_RTC > > driver. > > So this is safe to take on it's own and you are going to redo that > larger series? What I tried to say here is that this patch is now completely independent from the longer series, please apply it directly. Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web