Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1391402 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-29 22:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-30 00:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/xsaves: Fix xstate_offsets, xstate_sizes for legacy components Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/xsaves: Fix xstate_offsets, xstate_sizes for legacy components Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> - 2016-04-30 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/xsaves: Fix xstate_offsets, xstate_sizes for legacy components Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-30 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/xsaves: Fix xstate_offsets, xstate_sizes for legacy components Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> - 2016-04-30 00:30 +0200
| From | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 22:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/xsaves: Fix xstate_offsets, xstate_sizes for legacy components |
| Message-ID | <rtnd0-3HL-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 03/04/2016 10:12 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > The arrays xstate_offsets[] and xstate_sizes[] record XSAVE area > offsets and sizes. Values for legacy components i387 and XMMs were > not initialized. Fix it. Is this just a completeness thing or does it actually break something? In any case: Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 00:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/xsaves: Fix xstate_offsets, xstate_sizes for legacy components |
| Message-ID | <rtoVs-5lW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1391402 |
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:28:31PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 03/04/2016 10:12 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > The arrays xstate_offsets[] and xstate_sizes[] record XSAVE area > > offsets and sizes. Values for legacy components i387 and XMMs were > > not initialized. Fix it. > > Is this just a completeness thing or does it actually break something? PTRACE format conversion needs them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rtoVs-5lW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1391491 |
On 04/29/2016 03:07 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:28:31PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >> On 03/04/2016 10:12 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: >>> The arrays xstate_offsets[] and xstate_sizes[] record XSAVE area >>> offsets and sizes. Values for legacy components i387 and XMMs were >>> not initialized. Fix it. >> >> Is this just a completeness thing or does it actually break something? > > PTRACE format conversion needs them. If you respin these, can you please note that in the changelog and/or comments?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 00:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/xsaves: Fix xstate_offsets, xstate_sizes for legacy components |
| Message-ID | <rtp58-5rQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1391492 |
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:13:33PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 04/29/2016 03:07 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:28:31PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > >> On 03/04/2016 10:12 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > >>> The arrays xstate_offsets[] and xstate_sizes[] record XSAVE area > >>> offsets and sizes. Values for legacy components i387 and XMMs were > >>> not initialized. Fix it. > >> > >> Is this just a completeness thing or does it actually break something? > > > > PTRACE format conversion needs them. > > If you respin these, can you please note that in the changelog and/or > comments? Do you mean when it is rebased? I will do that.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web