Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1391645 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-30 19:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-30 19:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 19:10 +0200
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 19:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset |
| Message-ID | <rtGz0-2P3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:30:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function > > in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset() > > and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper. > > Have you verified that this compiles against my tree? This was done against linux-next. But now I have just rebased against the charmisc tree and sent v2. Also added the Reviewed-by tag to it. (hope thats ok) regards sudip
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web