Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1390618 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-29 01:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-29 02:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-29 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> - 2016-04-29 02:10 +0200
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 01:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC |
| Message-ID | <rt3nY-3WT-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > >> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and > >> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the > >> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale. > >> > >> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in > >> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS > >> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community. > >> > >> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann: > >> > > > > Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with > > and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7. > > > > to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided > not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull > request, hence the pull request contains only code changes. > > In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or > other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for > me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you. > > If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these > changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, for > your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@kernel.org. It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request, I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering the two of you the primary contacts now. Arnd
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 02:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rt4am-4LZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390618 |
On 29.04.2016 02:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> Hi Arnd, >> >> On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >>>> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and >>>> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the >>>> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale. >>>> >>>> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in >>>> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS >>>> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community. >>>> >>>> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann: >>>> >>> >>> Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with >>> and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7. >>> >> >> to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided >> not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull >> request, hence the pull request contains only code changes. >> >> In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or >> other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for >> me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you. >> >> If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these >> changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, for >> your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@kernel.org. > > It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches > separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request, > I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in > the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering > the two of you the primary contacts now. > Sounds good, I offload that anxiety from my mind then. Thank you. -- With best wishes, Vladimir
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web