Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1390570 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-28 23:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-29 09:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v7 22/24] [media] rtl2832: change the i2c gate to be mux-locked Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-28 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 22/24] [media] rtl2832: change the i2c gate to be mux-locked Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-29 09:00 +0200
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 23:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 22/24] [media] rtl2832: change the i2c gate to be mux-locked |
| Message-ID | <rt1YT-2LF-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:18:02PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > The root i2c adapter lock is then no longer held by the i2c mux during > accesses behind the i2c gate, and such accesses need to take that lock > just like any other ordinary i2c accesses do. > > So, declare the i2c gate mux-locked, and zap the regmap overrides > that makes the i2c accesses unlocked and use plain old regmap > accesses. This also removes the need for the regmap wrappers used by > rtl2832_sdr, so deconvolute the code further and provide the regmap > handle directly instead of the wrapper functions. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Antti, I'd need some tag from you since this is not the i2c realm.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rtaz8-1u8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390570 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
> So, I think all is ok, or do you need more than Tested-by? I think this will do. Thanks!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web