Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1390570 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v7 22/24] [media] rtl2832: change the i2c gate to be mux-locked

Started byWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
First post2016-04-28 23:50 +0200
Last post2016-04-29 09:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v7 22/24] [media] rtl2832: change the i2c gate to be  mux-locked Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-28 23:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 22/24] [media] rtl2832: change the i2c gate to be  mux-locked Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-29 09:00 +0200

#1390570 — Re: [PATCH v7 22/24] [media] rtl2832: change the i2c gate to be mux-locked

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-04-28 23:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 22/24] [media] rtl2832: change the i2c gate to be mux-locked
Message-ID<rt1YT-2LF-23@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:18:02PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The root i2c adapter lock is then no longer held by the i2c mux during
> accesses behind the i2c gate, and such accesses need to take that lock
> just like any other ordinary i2c accesses do.
> 
> So, declare the i2c gate mux-locked, and zap the regmap overrides
> that makes the i2c accesses unlocked and use plain old regmap
> accesses. This also removes the need for the regmap wrappers used by
> rtl2832_sdr, so deconvolute the code further and provide the regmap
> handle directly instead of the wrapper functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>

Antti, I'd need some tag from you since this is not the i2c realm.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1390806

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-04-29 09:00 +0200
Message-ID<rtaz8-1u8-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1390570

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

> So, I think all is ok, or do you need more than Tested-by?

I think this will do. Thanks!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web