Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1389062 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-27 15:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-28 17:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 7 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> - 2016-04-27 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-04-27 20:10 +0200
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 +0200
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-28 16:10 +0200
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 16:40 +0200
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-28 16:40 +0200
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 17:10 +0200
| From | Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 15:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback |
| Message-ID | <rsy0O-22y-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
The following condition can happen in a preemptible kernel, it may cause
checkpointer hunging.
CPU0: CPU1:
- write_checkpoint
- do_checkpoint
- wait_on_all_pages_writeback
- f2fs_write_end_io
- wake_up
this is last writebacked page, but
no sleeper in sbi->cp_wait wait
queue, wake_up is not been called.
- prepare_to_wait(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
Here, current task can been preempted,
but there will be no waker since last
write_end_io has bypassed wake_up. So
current task will sleep forever.
- io_schedule_timeout
Now we use spinlock to create a critical section to guarantee preemption
was disabled during racing in between wait_on_all_pages_writeback and
f2fs_write_end_io, so that above condition can be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 14 +++++++++-----
fs/f2fs/data.c | 9 +++++++--
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 3 ++-
fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index bf040b5..817cda7 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -914,15 +914,19 @@ static void wait_on_all_pages_writeback(struct
f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
- for (;;) {
+ spin_lock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
+
+ while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK)) {
prepare_to_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK))
- break;
+ spin_unlock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
+ io_schedule();
+ spin_lock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
- io_schedule_timeout(5*HZ);
+ finish_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait);
}
- finish_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait);
+
+ spin_unlock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
}
static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 38ce5d6..8faeada 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
{
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = bio->bi_private;
struct bio_vec *bvec;
+ unsigned long flags;
int i;
bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) {
@@ -74,8 +75,12 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK);
}
- if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK) && wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
- wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
+ if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK)) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sbi->cp_wb_lock, flags);
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
+ wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sbi->cp_wb_lock, flags);
+ }
bio_put(bio);
}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 0786a45..cf646b3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -725,7 +725,8 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
struct rw_semaphore cp_rwsem; /* blocking FS operations */
struct rw_semaphore node_write; /* locking node writes */
struct mutex writepages; /* mutex for writepages() */
- wait_queue_head_t cp_wait;
+ wait_queue_head_t cp_wait; /* for wait pages writeback */
+ spinlock_t cp_wb_lock; /* for protect cp_wait */
unsigned long last_time[MAX_TIME]; /* to store time in jiffies */
long interval_time[MAX_TIME]; /* to store thresholds */
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 19a85cf..8b25ac1 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -1436,6 +1436,7 @@ try_onemore:
init_rwsem(&sbi->cp_rwsem);
init_waitqueue_head(&sbi->cp_wait);
+ spin_lock_init(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
init_sb_info(sbi);
/* get an inode for meta space */
--
2.7.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 20:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback |
| Message-ID | <rsC4p-5HB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1389062 |
Hi Chao,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:41:48PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>
> The following condition can happen in a preemptible kernel, it may cause
> checkpointer hunging.
>
> CPU0: CPU1:
> - write_checkpoint
> - do_checkpoint
> - wait_on_all_pages_writeback
> - f2fs_write_end_io
> - wake_up
> this is last writebacked page, but
> no sleeper in sbi->cp_wait wait
> queue, wake_up is not been called.
> - prepare_to_wait(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
> Here, current task can been preempted,
> but there will be no waker since last
> write_end_io has bypassed wake_up. So
> current task will sleep forever.
> - io_schedule_timeout
Well, io_schedule_timeout should work for this?
Thanks,
> Now we use spinlock to create a critical section to guarantee preemption
> was disabled during racing in between wait_on_all_pages_writeback and
> f2fs_write_end_io, so that above condition can be avoided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 9 +++++++--
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 3 ++-
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index bf040b5..817cda7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -914,15 +914,19 @@ static void wait_on_all_pages_writeback(struct
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>
> - for (;;) {
> + spin_lock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
> +
> + while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK)) {
> prepare_to_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> - if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK))
> - break;
> + spin_unlock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
> + io_schedule();
> + spin_lock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
>
> - io_schedule_timeout(5*HZ);
> + finish_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait);
> }
> - finish_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
> }
>
> static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 38ce5d6..8faeada 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
> {
> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = bio->bi_private;
> struct bio_vec *bvec;
> + unsigned long flags;
> int i;
>
> bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) {
> @@ -74,8 +75,12 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
> dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK);
> }
>
> - if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK) && wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
> - wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
> + if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK)) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sbi->cp_wb_lock, flags);
> + if (wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
> + wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sbi->cp_wb_lock, flags);
> + }
>
> bio_put(bio);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 0786a45..cf646b3 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -725,7 +725,8 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
> struct rw_semaphore cp_rwsem; /* blocking FS operations */
> struct rw_semaphore node_write; /* locking node writes */
> struct mutex writepages; /* mutex for writepages() */
> - wait_queue_head_t cp_wait;
> + wait_queue_head_t cp_wait; /* for wait pages writeback */
> + spinlock_t cp_wb_lock; /* for protect cp_wait */
> unsigned long last_time[MAX_TIME]; /* to store time in jiffies */
> long interval_time[MAX_TIME]; /* to store thresholds */
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 19a85cf..8b25ac1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -1436,6 +1436,7 @@ try_onemore:
>
> init_rwsem(&sbi->cp_rwsem);
> init_waitqueue_head(&sbi->cp_wait);
> + spin_lock_init(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
> init_sb_info(sbi);
>
> /* get an inode for meta space */
> --
> 2.7.2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 14:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback |
| Message-ID | <rsSLU-2rx-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1389418 |
+Cc Peter,
Hi Peter,
This patch should be RFC, I haven't saw such issue in real world though, I still
worry that it may happen. Could you help to have a look at it.
This the question I'd like to ask here is that: in a preemptible kernel, if
thread A add itself into wait queue with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE status through
prepare_to_wait, after that, thread B do the preemption, if there are no waker
for thread A, will thread A sleep forever?
Thanks,
On 2016/4/28 2:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:41:48PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>
>> The following condition can happen in a preemptible kernel, it may cause
>> checkpointer hunging.
>>
>> CPU0: CPU1:
>> - write_checkpoint
>> - do_checkpoint
>> - wait_on_all_pages_writeback
>> - f2fs_write_end_io
>> - wake_up
>> this is last writebacked page, but
>> no sleeper in sbi->cp_wait wait
>> queue, wake_up is not been called.
>> - prepare_to_wait(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
>> Here, current task can been preempted,
>> but there will be no waker since last
>> write_end_io has bypassed wake_up. So
>> current task will sleep forever.
>> - io_schedule_timeout
>
> Well, io_schedule_timeout should work for this?
>
> Thanks,
>
>> Now we use spinlock to create a critical section to guarantee preemption
>> was disabled during racing in between wait_on_all_pages_writeback and
>> f2fs_write_end_io, so that above condition can be avoided.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 9 +++++++--
>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 3 ++-
>> fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> index bf040b5..817cda7 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> @@ -914,15 +914,19 @@ static void wait_on_all_pages_writeback(struct
>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>> {
>> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>>
>> - for (;;) {
>> + spin_lock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
>> +
>> + while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK)) {
>> prepare_to_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>>
>> - if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK))
>> - break;
>> + spin_unlock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
>> + io_schedule();
>> + spin_lock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
>>
>> - io_schedule_timeout(5*HZ);
>> + finish_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait);
>> }
>> - finish_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait);
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
>> }
>>
>> static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> index 38ce5d6..8faeada 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
>> {
>> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = bio->bi_private;
>> struct bio_vec *bvec;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> int i;
>>
>> bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) {
>> @@ -74,8 +75,12 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
>> dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK);
>> }
>>
>> - if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK) && wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
>> - wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
>> + if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK)) {
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sbi->cp_wb_lock, flags);
>> + if (wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
>> + wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sbi->cp_wb_lock, flags);
>> + }
>>
>> bio_put(bio);
>> }
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> index 0786a45..cf646b3 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> @@ -725,7 +725,8 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>> struct rw_semaphore cp_rwsem; /* blocking FS operations */
>> struct rw_semaphore node_write; /* locking node writes */
>> struct mutex writepages; /* mutex for writepages() */
>> - wait_queue_head_t cp_wait;
>> + wait_queue_head_t cp_wait; /* for wait pages writeback */
>> + spinlock_t cp_wb_lock; /* for protect cp_wait */
>> unsigned long last_time[MAX_TIME]; /* to store time in jiffies */
>> long interval_time[MAX_TIME]; /* to store thresholds */
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> index 19a85cf..8b25ac1 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> @@ -1436,6 +1436,7 @@ try_onemore:
>>
>> init_rwsem(&sbi->cp_rwsem);
>> init_waitqueue_head(&sbi->cp_wait);
>> + spin_lock_init(&sbi->cp_wb_lock);
>> init_sb_info(sbi);
>>
>> /* get an inode for meta space */
>> --
>> 2.7.2
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
> Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
> your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
> reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> .
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 16:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback |
| Message-ID | <rsUNI-4t4-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390074 |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:51:04PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:41:48PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > >> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> > >> > >> The following condition can happen in a preemptible kernel, it may cause > >> checkpointer hunging. > >> > >> CPU0: CPU1: > >> - write_checkpoint > >> - do_checkpoint > >> - wait_on_all_pages_writeback > >> - f2fs_write_end_io > >> - wake_up > >> this is last writebacked page, but > >> no sleeper in sbi->cp_wait wait > >> queue, wake_up is not been called. > >> - prepare_to_wait(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) > >> Here, current task can been preempted, > >> but there will be no waker since last > >> write_end_io has bypassed wake_up. So > >> current task will sleep forever. But here, you should be verifying if you really should go sleep; as the code did; it tests for !get_pages(, F2FS_WRITEBACK), and if you've just completed that very last one, this will break out. > >> - io_schedule_timeout > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 16:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback |
| Message-ID | <rsVgK-4Ob-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390237 |
On 2016/4/28 22:03, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:51:04PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:41:48PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> >>>> >>>> The following condition can happen in a preemptible kernel, it may cause >>>> checkpointer hunging. >>>> >>>> CPU0: CPU1: >>>> - write_checkpoint >>>> - do_checkpoint >>>> - wait_on_all_pages_writeback >>>> - f2fs_write_end_io >>>> - wake_up >>>> this is last writebacked page, but >>>> no sleeper in sbi->cp_wait wait >>>> queue, wake_up is not been called. >>>> - prepare_to_wait(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) >>>> Here, current task can been preempted, >>>> but there will be no waker since last >>>> write_end_io has bypassed wake_up. So >>>> current task will sleep forever. > > But here, you should be verifying if you really should go sleep; as the > code did; it tests for !get_pages(, F2FS_WRITEBACK), and if you've just > completed that very last one, this will break out. You mean after being preempted with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE status, that task still has chance to be scheduled to check '!get_pages(, F2FS_WRITEBACK)', is that right? > >>>> - io_schedule_timeout >>>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 16:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback |
| Message-ID | <rsVgL-4Ob-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390260 |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:30:55PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2016/4/28 22:03, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:51:04PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:41:48PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> > >>>> > >>>> The following condition can happen in a preemptible kernel, it may cause > >>>> checkpointer hunging. > >>>> > >>>> CPU0: CPU1: > >>>> - write_checkpoint > >>>> - do_checkpoint > >>>> - wait_on_all_pages_writeback > >>>> - f2fs_write_end_io > >>>> - wake_up > >>>> this is last writebacked page, but > >>>> no sleeper in sbi->cp_wait wait > >>>> queue, wake_up is not been called. > >>>> - prepare_to_wait(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) > >>>> Here, current task can been preempted, > >>>> but there will be no waker since last > >>>> write_end_io has bypassed wake_up. So > >>>> current task will sleep forever. > > > > But here, you should be verifying if you really should go sleep; as the > > code did; it tests for !get_pages(, F2FS_WRITEBACK), and if you've just > > completed that very last one, this will break out. > > You mean after being preempted with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE status, that task still > has chance to be scheduled to check '!get_pages(, F2FS_WRITEBACK)', is that right? Yes, preemption ignores task_struct::state.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 17:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND 2/2] f2fs: disable preemption when waiting on all pages writeback |
| Message-ID | <rsVJM-5u4-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1390265 |
On 2016/4/28 22:37, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:30:55PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2016/4/28 22:03, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:51:04PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:41:48PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> The following condition can happen in a preemptible kernel, it may cause >>>>>> checkpointer hunging. >>>>>> >>>>>> CPU0: CPU1: >>>>>> - write_checkpoint >>>>>> - do_checkpoint >>>>>> - wait_on_all_pages_writeback >>>>>> - f2fs_write_end_io >>>>>> - wake_up >>>>>> this is last writebacked page, but >>>>>> no sleeper in sbi->cp_wait wait >>>>>> queue, wake_up is not been called. >>>>>> - prepare_to_wait(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) >>>>>> Here, current task can been preempted, >>>>>> but there will be no waker since last >>>>>> write_end_io has bypassed wake_up. So >>>>>> current task will sleep forever. >>> >>> But here, you should be verifying if you really should go sleep; as the >>> code did; it tests for !get_pages(, F2FS_WRITEBACK), and if you've just >>> completed that very last one, this will break out. >> >> You mean after being preempted with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE status, that task still >> has chance to be scheduled to check '!get_pages(, F2FS_WRITEBACK)', is that right? > > Yes, preemption ignores task_struct::state. Got it. Thanks very much for your help! :) >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web