Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1387006 > unrolled thread

linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2016-04-26 01:50 +0200
Last post2016-04-26 09:50 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-04-26 01:50 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-26 02:00 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-04-26 03:00 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-26 09:50 +0200

#1387006 — linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-04-26 01:50 +0200
Subjectlinux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree
Message-ID<rrYqm-63w-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi all,

After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

ERROR: "of_flash_probe_versatile" [drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.ko] undefined!

Caused by commit

  b0afd44bc192 ("mtd: physmap_of: add a hook for Versatile write protection")

I used the arm-soc tree from next-20160422 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1387008

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-04-26 02:00 +0200
Message-ID<rrYA2-67A-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1387006
On Tuesday 26 April 2016 09:43:31 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> ERROR: "of_flash_probe_versatile" [drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.ko] undefined!
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   b0afd44bc192 ("mtd: physmap_of: add a hook for Versatile write protection")
> 
> I used the arm-soc tree from next-20160422 for today.
> 

Ah, sorry about that. I think I fixed it up just as you pulled it in.
If you don't mind, could you try pulling the tree once more on top
of what you have?

	Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1387041

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-04-26 03:00 +0200
Message-ID<rrZw6-6PQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1387008
Hi Arnd,

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:54:20 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> Ah, sorry about that. I think I fixed it up just as you pulled it in.
> If you don't mind, could you try pulling the tree once more on top
> of what you have?

Sorry, but I need to keep going if I am to finish each day.  I will
fetch it for tomorrow, though.  If I finish early enough, I will see if
I can fetch and merge it at the end ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1387197

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-04-26 09:50 +0200
Message-ID<rs5US-3CS-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1387041
On Tuesday 26 April 2016 10:51:50 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:54:20 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, sorry about that. I think I fixed it up just as you pulled it in.
> > If you don't mind, could you try pulling the tree once more on top
> > of what you have?
> 
> Sorry, but I need to keep going if I am to finish each day.  I will
> fetch it for tomorrow, though.  If I finish early enough, I will see if
> I can fetch and merge it at the end ...
> 

Ok, fair enough. I've now merged the latest arm-soc/for-next branch with
today's linux-next to give it some extra time on the test infrastructure.

	Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web