Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1384938 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-22 12:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-22 12:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH V4 1/4] gpio: tegra: Don't open code of_device_get_match_data() Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-04-22 12:30 +0200
[PATCH V4 4/4] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-04-22 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - 2016-04-22 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-04-25 11:00 +0200
[PATCH V4 2/4] gpio: tegra: Make of_device_id compatible data to constant Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-04-22 12:30 +0200
| From | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-22 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH V4 1/4] gpio: tegra: Don't open code of_device_get_match_data() |
| Message-ID | <rqGvw-qK-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Use of_device_get_match_data() for getting matched data
instead of implementing this locally.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
Collected reviewed/ack by from Stephen, Alexandre and Thieery.
drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
index 790bb11..1b0c497 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ struct tegra_gpio_bank {
#endif
};
+struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {
+ u32 bank_stride;
+ u32 upper_offset;
+};
+
static struct device *dev;
static struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
static void __iomem *regs;
@@ -445,27 +450,6 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra_gpio_pm_ops = {
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra_gpio_suspend, tegra_gpio_resume)
};
-struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {
- u32 bank_stride;
- u32 upper_offset;
-};
-
-static struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra20_gpio_config = {
- .bank_stride = 0x80,
- .upper_offset = 0x800,
-};
-
-static struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra30_gpio_config = {
- .bank_stride = 0x100,
- .upper_offset = 0x80,
-};
-
-static const struct of_device_id tegra_gpio_of_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-gpio", .data = &tegra30_gpio_config },
- { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-gpio", .data = &tegra20_gpio_config },
- { },
-};
-
/* This lock class tells lockdep that GPIO irqs are in a different
* category than their parents, so it won't report false recursion.
*/
@@ -473,8 +457,7 @@ static struct lock_class_key gpio_lock_class;
static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- const struct of_device_id *match;
- struct tegra_gpio_soc_config *config;
+ const struct tegra_gpio_soc_config *config;
struct resource *res;
struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank;
int ret;
@@ -484,12 +467,11 @@ static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev = &pdev->dev;
- match = of_match_device(tegra_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev);
- if (!match) {
+ config = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!config) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error: No device match found\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
- config = (struct tegra_gpio_soc_config *)match->data;
tegra_gpio_bank_stride = config->bank_stride;
tegra_gpio_upper_offset = config->upper_offset;
@@ -578,6 +560,22 @@ static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
+static struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra20_gpio_config = {
+ .bank_stride = 0x80,
+ .upper_offset = 0x800,
+};
+
+static struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra30_gpio_config = {
+ .bank_stride = 0x100,
+ .upper_offset = 0x80,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id tegra_gpio_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-gpio", .data = &tegra30_gpio_config },
+ { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-gpio", .data = &tegra20_gpio_config },
+ { },
+};
+
static struct platform_driver tegra_gpio_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "tegra-gpio",
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-22 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH V4 4/4] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce |
| Message-ID | <rqGvw-qK-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1384938 |
NVIDIA's Tegra210 support the HW debounce in the GPIO controller
for all its GPIO pins.
Add support for setting debounce timing by implementing the
set_debounce callback of gpiochip.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
Changes from V1:
- Write debounce count before enable.
- Make sure the debounce count do not have any boot residuals.
Changes from V2:
- Only access register for debounce when SoC support debounce.
Changes from V3:
- Add locking mechanism in debounce count register update.
- Move DBC register from prev patch to here.
drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
index 6af5eb2..45d80ec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
@@ -46,10 +46,13 @@
#define GPIO_INT_ENB(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + 0x50)
#define GPIO_INT_LVL(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + 0x60)
#define GPIO_INT_CLR(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + 0x70)
+#define GPIO_DBC_CNT(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + 0xF0)
+
#define GPIO_MSK_CNF(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x00)
#define GPIO_MSK_OE(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x10)
#define GPIO_MSK_OUT(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0X20)
+#define GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x30)
#define GPIO_MSK_INT_STA(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x40)
#define GPIO_MSK_INT_ENB(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x50)
#define GPIO_MSK_INT_LVL(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x60)
@@ -67,6 +70,7 @@ struct tegra_gpio_bank {
int bank;
int irq;
spinlock_t lvl_lock[4];
+ spinlock_t dbc_lock[4]; /* Lock for updating debounce count register */
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
u32 cnf[4];
u32 out[4];
@@ -74,11 +78,14 @@ struct tegra_gpio_bank {
u32 int_enb[4];
u32 int_lvl[4];
u32 wake_enb[4];
+ u32 dbc_enb[4];
#endif
+ u32 dbc_cnt[4];
struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi;
};
struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {
+ bool debounce_supported;
u32 bank_stride;
u32 upper_offset;
};
@@ -182,6 +189,38 @@ static int tegra_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
return 0;
}
+static int tegra_gpio_set_debounce(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
+ unsigned int debounce)
+{
+ struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ unsigned int debounce_ms = DIV_ROUND_UP(debounce, 1000);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int port = GPIO_PORT(offset);
+ int bank = GPIO_BANK(offset);
+
+ if (!debounce_ms) {
+ tegra_gpio_mask_write(tgi, GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(tgi, offset),
+ offset, 0);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ debounce_ms = min(debounce_ms, 255U);
+
+ /* There is only one debounce count register per port and hence
+ * set the maximum of current and requested debounce time.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tgi->bank_info[bank].dbc_lock[port], flags);
+ if (tgi->bank_info[bank].dbc_cnt[port] < debounce_ms) {
+ tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, debounce_ms, GPIO_DBC_CNT(tgi, offset));
+ tgi->bank_info[bank].dbc_cnt[port] = debounce_ms;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tgi->bank_info[bank].dbc_lock[port], flags);
+
+ tegra_gpio_mask_write(tgi, GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(tgi, offset), offset, 1);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int tegra_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
{
struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -197,6 +236,7 @@ static struct gpio_chip tegra_gpio_chip = {
.get = tegra_gpio_get,
.direction_output = tegra_gpio_direction_output,
.set = tegra_gpio_set,
+ .set_debounce = tegra_gpio_set_debounce,
.to_irq = tegra_gpio_to_irq,
.base = 0,
};
@@ -360,6 +400,14 @@ static int tegra_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
unsigned int gpio = (b<<5) | (p<<3);
tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->cnf[p],
GPIO_CNF(tgi, gpio));
+
+ if (tgi->soc->debounce_supported) {
+ tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->dbc_cnt[p],
+ GPIO_DBC_CNT(tgi, gpio));
+ tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->dbc_enb[p],
+ GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(tgi, gpio));
+ }
+
tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->out[p],
GPIO_OUT(tgi, gpio));
tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->oe[p],
@@ -395,6 +443,13 @@ static int tegra_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
GPIO_OUT(tgi, gpio));
bank->oe[p] = tegra_gpio_readl(tgi,
GPIO_OE(tgi, gpio));
+ if (tgi->soc->debounce_supported) {
+ bank->dbc_enb[p] = tegra_gpio_readl(tgi,
+ GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(tgi, gpio));
+ bank->dbc_enb[p] = (bank->dbc_enb[p] << 8) |
+ bank->dbc_enb[p];
+ }
+
bank->int_enb[p] = tegra_gpio_readl(tgi,
GPIO_INT_ENB(tgi, gpio));
bank->int_lvl[p] = tegra_gpio_readl(tgi,
@@ -547,6 +602,9 @@ static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tgi);
+ if (!config->debounce_supported)
+ tgi->gc->set_debounce = NULL;
+
tgi->bank_info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, tgi->bank_count *
sizeof(*tgi->bank_info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tgi->bank_info)
@@ -607,8 +665,10 @@ static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(bank->irq,
tegra_gpio_irq_handler, bank);
- for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
spin_lock_init(&bank->lvl_lock[j]);
+ spin_lock_init(&bank->dbc_lock[j]);
+ }
}
tegra_gpio_debuginit(tgi);
@@ -626,7 +686,14 @@ static const struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra30_gpio_config = {
.upper_offset = 0x80,
};
+static const struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra210_gpio_config = {
+ .debounce_supported = true,
+ .bank_stride = 0x100,
+ .upper_offset = 0x80,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id tegra_gpio_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-gpio", .data = &tegra210_gpio_config },
{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-gpio", .data = &tegra30_gpio_config },
{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-gpio", .data = &tegra20_gpio_config },
{ },
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-22 22:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce |
| Message-ID | <rqPp8-7ph-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1384939 |
On 04/22/2016 04:09 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > NVIDIA's Tegra210 support the HW debounce in the GPIO controller > for all its GPIO pins. > > Add support for setting debounce timing by implementing the > set_debounce callback of gpiochip. Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-25 07:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce |
| Message-ID | <rrHpw-u5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1384939 |
Sorry, just realized I commented on v3...
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
> NVIDIA's Tegra210 support the HW debounce in the GPIO controller
> for all its GPIO pins.
>
> Add support for setting debounce timing by implementing the
> set_debounce callback of gpiochip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>
> ---
> Changes from V1:
> - Write debounce count before enable.
> - Make sure the debounce count do not have any boot residuals.
>
> Changes from V2:
> - Only access register for debounce when SoC support debounce.
>
> Changes from V3:
> - Add locking mechanism in debounce count register update.
> - Move DBC register from prev patch to here.
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
> index 6af5eb2..45d80ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
> @@ -46,10 +46,13 @@
> #define GPIO_INT_ENB(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + 0x50)
> #define GPIO_INT_LVL(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + 0x60)
> #define GPIO_INT_CLR(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + 0x70)
> +#define GPIO_DBC_CNT(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + 0xF0)
> +
>
> #define GPIO_MSK_CNF(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x00)
> #define GPIO_MSK_OE(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x10)
> #define GPIO_MSK_OUT(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0X20)
> +#define GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x30)
> #define GPIO_MSK_INT_STA(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x40)
> #define GPIO_MSK_INT_ENB(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x50)
> #define GPIO_MSK_INT_LVL(t, x) (GPIO_REG(t, x) + t->soc->upper_offset + 0x60)
> @@ -67,6 +70,7 @@ struct tegra_gpio_bank {
> int bank;
> int irq;
> spinlock_t lvl_lock[4];
> + spinlock_t dbc_lock[4]; /* Lock for updating debounce count register */
I'm nit'ing here, but maybe one spinlock shared by all ports would be
enough? (the same would apply to lvl_lock, so feel free to do this as
a separate patch) I don't think we expect *that* many concurrent
accesses, do we?
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> u32 cnf[4];
> u32 out[4];
> @@ -74,11 +78,14 @@ struct tegra_gpio_bank {
> u32 int_enb[4];
> u32 int_lvl[4];
> u32 wake_enb[4];
> + u32 dbc_enb[4];
> #endif
> + u32 dbc_cnt[4];
> struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi;
> };
>
> struct tegra_gpio_soc_config {
> + bool debounce_supported;
> u32 bank_stride;
> u32 upper_offset;
> };
> @@ -182,6 +189,38 @@ static int tegra_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int tegra_gpio_set_debounce(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> + unsigned int debounce)
> +{
> + struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + unsigned int debounce_ms = DIV_ROUND_UP(debounce, 1000);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int port = GPIO_PORT(offset);
> + int bank = GPIO_BANK(offset);
Maybe declare "bank" as follows:
struct tegra_gpio_bank *bank = &tgi->bank_info[GPIO_BANK(offset)];
This will allow you to simplify the code that follows:
> +
> + if (!debounce_ms) {
> + tegra_gpio_mask_write(tgi, GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(tgi, offset),
> + offset, 0);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + debounce_ms = min(debounce_ms, 255U);
> +
> + /* There is only one debounce count register per port and hence
> + * set the maximum of current and requested debounce time.
> + */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tgi->bank_info[bank].dbc_lock[port], flags);
> + if (tgi->bank_info[bank].dbc_cnt[port] < debounce_ms) {
> + tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, debounce_ms, GPIO_DBC_CNT(tgi, offset));
> + tgi->bank_info[bank].dbc_cnt[port] = debounce_ms;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tgi->bank_info[bank].dbc_lock[port], flags);
Becomes:
spin_lock_irqsave(bank->dbc_lock[port], flags);
if (bank->dbc_cnt[port] < debounce_ms) {
tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, debounce_ms, GPIO_DBC_CNT(tgi, offset));
bank->dbc_cnt[port] = debounce_ms;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->dbc_lock[port], flags);
Which is nicer to the eyes.
Extra points if you initialize port and bank after we ensure that
debounce_ms is not zero and that their value will actually be used.
> +
> + tegra_gpio_mask_write(tgi, GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(tgi, offset), offset, 1);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int tegra_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> {
> struct tegra_gpio_info *tgi = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> @@ -197,6 +236,7 @@ static struct gpio_chip tegra_gpio_chip = {
> .get = tegra_gpio_get,
> .direction_output = tegra_gpio_direction_output,
> .set = tegra_gpio_set,
> + .set_debounce = tegra_gpio_set_debounce,
> .to_irq = tegra_gpio_to_irq,
> .base = 0,
> };
> @@ -360,6 +400,14 @@ static int tegra_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
> unsigned int gpio = (b<<5) | (p<<3);
> tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->cnf[p],
> GPIO_CNF(tgi, gpio));
> +
> + if (tgi->soc->debounce_supported) {
> + tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->dbc_cnt[p],
> + GPIO_DBC_CNT(tgi, gpio));
> + tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->dbc_enb[p],
> + GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(tgi, gpio));
> + }
> +
> tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->out[p],
> GPIO_OUT(tgi, gpio));
> tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, bank->oe[p],
> @@ -395,6 +443,13 @@ static int tegra_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> GPIO_OUT(tgi, gpio));
> bank->oe[p] = tegra_gpio_readl(tgi,
> GPIO_OE(tgi, gpio));
> + if (tgi->soc->debounce_supported) {
> + bank->dbc_enb[p] = tegra_gpio_readl(tgi,
> + GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(tgi, gpio));
> + bank->dbc_enb[p] = (bank->dbc_enb[p] << 8) |
> + bank->dbc_enb[p];
> + }
> +
> bank->int_enb[p] = tegra_gpio_readl(tgi,
> GPIO_INT_ENB(tgi, gpio));
> bank->int_lvl[p] = tegra_gpio_readl(tgi,
> @@ -547,6 +602,9 @@ static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tgi);
>
> + if (!config->debounce_supported)
> + tgi->gc->set_debounce = NULL;
Yep, we really want one gpio_chip instance in the tegra_gpio_info
struct, otherwise this kind of limits the purpose of getting rid of
these global variables...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-25 11:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce |
| Message-ID | <rrKx4-2Lh-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1386023 |
On Monday 25 April 2016 11:06 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Sorry, just realized I commented on v3...
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> + spinlock_t dbc_lock[4]; /* Lock for updating debounce count register */
> I'm nit'ing here, but maybe one spinlock shared by all ports would be
> enough? (the same would apply to lvl_lock, so feel free to do this as
> a separate patch) I don't think we expect *that* many concurrent
> accesses, do we?
Really no, but to make the stuff uniform, it should be fine here. If the
registers are not conflicting then do not make under same lock.
>>
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(bank->dbc_lock[port], flags);
>> if (bank->dbc_cnt[port] < debounce_ms) {
>> tegra_gpio_writel(tgi, debounce_ms, GPIO_DBC_CNT(tgi, offset));
>> bank->dbc_cnt[port] = debounce_ms;
>> }
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->dbc_lock[port], flags);
>>
>> Which is nicer to the eyes.
>>
OK, this also looks fine. As I am goign to respin this for V5 (for gc as
instance rather than pointer), I will take care of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-22 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH V4 2/4] gpio: tegra: Make of_device_id compatible data to constant |
| Message-ID | <rqGvw-qK-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1384938 |
The data member of the of_device_id is the constant type
and hence all static structure which is used for this
initialisation as static.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Suggested-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
---
Changes from V2:
-This is new in series based on discussion on previous patches.
Changes from V3:
- Collected RB of Stephen.
drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
index 1b0c497..cd69422 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
@@ -560,12 +560,12 @@ static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-static struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra20_gpio_config = {
+static const struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra20_gpio_config = {
.bank_stride = 0x80,
.upper_offset = 0x800,
};
-static struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra30_gpio_config = {
+static const struct tegra_gpio_soc_config tegra30_gpio_config = {
.bank_stride = 0x100,
.upper_offset = 0x80,
};
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web