Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1382210 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-19 09:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-19 15:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.6-rc4 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-04-19 09:00 +0200
Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.6-rc4 (parisc warnings) Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> - 2016-04-19 15:40 +0200
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 09:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.6-rc4 |
| Message-ID | <rpxNE-2xF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in
> v4.6-rc4[1] compared to v4.5[2].
>
> Summarized:
> - build errors: +11/-7
> - build warnings: +16376/-165
Sorry for the delay, initially I didn't realize why my first report didn't make
it to the list. It was too big, due to 16211 warnings in parisc-allmodconfig
about "-ffunction-sections disabled; it makes profiling impossible [enabled by
default]".
> JFYI, when comparing v4.6-rc4[1] to v4.6-rc3[3], the summaries are:
> - build errors: +9/-9
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c: error:
'struct pci_dn' has no member named 'edev': => 272:8
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c: error:
dereferencing pointer to incomplete type: => 215:7
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c: error:
implicit declaration of function 'eeh_dev_init'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 212:3
powerpc-randconfig
+ /home/kisskb/slave/src/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c: error:
implicit declaration of function 'device_reset'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 560:2
x86_64-randconfig (patch available)
> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/10194/ (all 262 configs)
> [3] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/10162/ (all 262 configs)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 15:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.6-rc4 (parisc warnings) |
| Message-ID | <rpE2K-7D5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1382210 |
Hi Geert, On 19.04.2016 08:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in >> v4.6-rc4[1] compared to v4.5[2]. >> >> Summarized: >> - build errors: +11/-7 >> - build warnings: +16376/-165 <tel:+16376165> > > Sorry for the delay, initially I didn't realize why my first report didn't make > it to the list. It was too big, due to 16211 warnings in parisc-allmodconfig > about "-ffunction-sections disabled; it makes profiling impossible [enabled by > default]". I checked the parisc warnings, and looking at http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12665382/ it seems a gcc-4.6 (/opt/cross/gcc-4.6.3-nolibc/hppa-linux/bin/hppa-linux-gcc) compiler is still being used. I tend to think, that gcc-4.6 wasn't able to generate function sections which is why we see those warnings now (there was a FTRACE patch from me included before v4.6-rc4). Anyway, I can't reproduce those warnings with gcc-4.8 and higher. Given the fact, that we even switched on debian now to use gcc-5 for the kernel, can someone please update the 32- and 64-bit parisc compilers on the kiss infrastructure to at least gcc-4.8 (gcc-4.9 or gcc-5 being preferred). Thanks, Helge
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web