Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1382037 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] localmodconfig: Fix parsing of Kconfig "source" statements

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/2] localmodconfig: Fix parsing of Kconfig "source"  statements Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com> - 2016-04-18 22:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] localmodconfig: Fix parsing of Kconfig "source"  statements Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-04-18 23:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] localmodconfig: Fix parsing of Kconfig "source"  statements Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com> - 2016-04-19 02:00 +0200

#1382037 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] localmodconfig: Fix parsing of Kconfig "source" statements

On 2016/04/10 16:52, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> On 2016/04/08 14:29, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Sat,  2 Apr 2016 10:55:21 -0700
> > Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > The parameter of Kconfig "source" statements does not need to be quoted.
> > > The current regex causes many kconfig files to be skipped and hence,
> > > dependencies to be missed.
> > > 
> > > Also fix the whitespace repeat count.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
> > 
> > Thanks for sending this. I'll apply it. Should this be marked for
> > stable? And if so, how far back?
> 
> The first problem dates back to the introduction of streamline_config.pl in
> 	dcc6024 kconfig: add streamline_config.pl to scripts (v2.6.32-rc1)
> The second problem started with
> 	19e91b6 modsign: Allow external signing key to be specified (v4.3-rc1)
> 
> However, I'm not sure that adding the patch to stable is warranted. I
> considered this with regards to the problem fixed by patch 1/2.
> 
> First, I searched for cases where dependency info that's currently missing
> would lead to lead to symbols being erroneously deactivated but I did not find
> any. Since these cases are not so obvious and are quite rare in general, it's
> possible that I missed one but at this stage the problem is theoretical.
> 
> Second, even if there is such a case, I'm not sure that the problem is
> "critical". streamline_config.pl may output an "invalid" config because
> it misses some dependencies but the config will be fixed by the
> invocation of silentoldconfig that comes right after in the
> localmodconfig makefile rule. It might not be the config the user
> wanted, but it will be valid.
> 
> However, while looking for such a case, I've noticed a few other issues in
> streamline_config.pl and I'll send more patches shortly.

Hi Steven,

Can you please merge these six patches (2 original + 4 followups)?

Thank you,
-Benjamin

> 
> > 
> > -- Steve
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl b/scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl
> > > index f3d3fb4..7036ae3 100755
> > > --- a/scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl
> > > +++ b/scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl
> > > @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ sub read_kconfig {
> > >  	$cont = 0;
> > >  
> > >  	# collect any Kconfig sources
> > > -	if (/^source\s*"(.*)"/) {
> > > +	if (/^source\s+"?([^"]+)/) {
> > >  	    my $kconfig = $1;
> > >  	    # prevent reading twice.
> > >  	    if (!defined($read_kconfigs{$kconfig})) {
> > 
> > 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1382075

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:29:12 -0700
Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com> wrote:

> On 2016/04/10 16:52, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > On 2016/04/08 14:29, Steven Rostedt wrote:  
> > > On Sat,  2 Apr 2016 10:55:21 -0700
> > > Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > The parameter of Kconfig "source" statements does not need to be quoted.
> > > > The current regex causes many kconfig files to be skipped and hence,
> > > > dependencies to be missed.
> > > > 
> > > > Also fix the whitespace repeat count.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>  
> > > 
> > > Thanks for sending this. I'll apply it. Should this be marked for
> > > stable? And if so, how far back?  
> > 
> > The first problem dates back to the introduction of streamline_config.pl in
> > 	dcc6024 kconfig: add streamline_config.pl to scripts (v2.6.32-rc1)
> > The second problem started with
> > 	19e91b6 modsign: Allow external signing key to be specified (v4.3-rc1)
> > 
> > However, I'm not sure that adding the patch to stable is warranted. I
> > considered this with regards to the problem fixed by patch 1/2.
> > 
> > First, I searched for cases where dependency info that's currently missing
> > would lead to lead to symbols being erroneously deactivated but I did not find
> > any. Since these cases are not so obvious and are quite rare in general, it's
> > possible that I missed one but at this stage the problem is theoretical.
> > 
> > Second, even if there is such a case, I'm not sure that the problem is
> > "critical". streamline_config.pl may output an "invalid" config because
> > it misses some dependencies but the config will be fixed by the
> > invocation of silentoldconfig that comes right after in the
> > localmodconfig makefile rule. It might not be the config the user
> > wanted, but it will be valid.
> > 
> > However, while looking for such a case, I've noticed a few other issues in
> > streamline_config.pl and I'll send more patches shortly.  
> 
> Hi Steven,
> 
> Can you please merge these six patches (2 original + 4 followups)?
> 

OK, I've marked them as todo. I've just come back from two weeks of
conferences and I'm working on catching up.

-- Steve

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1382105

On 2016/04/18 17:43, Steven Rostedt wrote:
[...]
> > Hi Steven,
> > 
> > Can you please merge these six patches (2 original + 4 followups)?
> > 
> 
> OK, I've marked them as todo. I've just come back from two weeks of
> conferences and I'm working on catching up.
> 

Ah I see, thanks. I just wanted to be sure they didn't fall through the
cracks.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web