Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1380294 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-15 23:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-18 22:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] Add EDAC peripheral init functions & Ethernet EDAC. Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-15 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Add EDAC peripheral init functions & Ethernet EDAC. Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-18 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Add EDAC peripheral init functions & Ethernet EDAC. Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-18 22:10 +0200
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 23:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Add EDAC peripheral init functions & Ethernet EDAC. |
| Message-ID | <rojMK-1ee-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:27:54AM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> I'll update this patch to only count errors.
... and also think about what that counting is going to bring. If it is
only going to be there to show how many network errors happened and we
can't do anything about it except stare at that number, then adding all
that code is probably waste of time an electrons...
I'm just sayin'.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. Srsly.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rpnEB-317-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1380294 |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:02:27PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > the number of uncorrectable errors is useful from a system point of
> > view.
I forgot: so altr_edac_a10_ecc_irq() panics on uncorrectable errors. Do we want
to do that even for UEs coming from the network...?
Seems a bit overboard to me...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. Srsly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rpnEB-317-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1380294 |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:27:16AM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> We're still getting the single bit correction
By that you mean, you get that by enabling ECC on the FIFO block?
> which makes the entire system more stable and the ability to see both
> single bit errors corrected and the number of uncorrectable errors is
> useful from a system point of view.
If so, that makes sense, yes.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. Srsly.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web