Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1381861 > unrolled thread

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] security: Introduce security_settime64()

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] security: Introduce security_settime64() Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-18 18:10 +0200
    Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] security: Introduce security_settime64() Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-18 18:40 +0200
      Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] security: Introduce security_settime64() Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> - 2016-04-19 04:00 +0200

#1381861 — Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] security: Introduce security_settime64()

On Friday 08 April 2016 14:02:11 Baolin Wang wrote:
> security_settime() uses a timespec, which is not year 2038 safe
> on 32bit systems. Thus this patch introduces the security_settime64()
> function with timespec64 type. We also convert the cap_settime() helper
> function to use the 64bit types.
> 
> Move the security_settime() to the head file as a inline function for
> removing that inline helper when following up patches are fixed the
> call sites.
> 
> None of the existing hooks is using the timespec argument and therefor
> the patch is not doing any functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>

I seem to have only received patches 3 and 4, both on my personal
address and on lkml. Any idea what happened?

Unless you did not mean to send these patches at all, could you resend
the entire series and put me and the y2038 list on cc to all of the
patches?

	Arnd

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1381895

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:01:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> I seem to have only received patches 3 and 4, both on my personal
> address and on lkml. Any idea what happened?

> Unless you did not mean to send these patches at all, could you resend
> the entire series and put me and the y2038 list on cc to all of the
> patches?

If other patches have already been accepted then just send this as a
single two patch series - the numbering only matters to keep thingsin
order within a given posting.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1382122

On 19 April 2016 at 00:31, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:01:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> I seem to have only received patches 3 and 4, both on my personal
>> address and on lkml. Any idea what happened?
>
>> Unless you did not mean to send these patches at all, could you resend
>> the entire series and put me and the y2038 list on cc to all of the
>> patches?
>
> If other patches have already been accepted then just send this as a
> single two patch series - the numbering only matters to keep thingsin
> order within a given posting.

That's right. Patch 1, 2 and 5 had been applied by John, but these two
didn't. So I resend them. Thanks.


-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web