Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1383075 > unrolled thread

Re: A mainline question about cgroup writeback

Started byAlex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com>
First post2016-04-20 08:40 +0200
Last post2016-04-20 08:40 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: A mainline question about cgroup writeback Alex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:40 +0200

#1383075 — Re: A mainline question about cgroup writeback

FromAlex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-20 08:40 +0200
SubjectRe: A mainline question about cgroup writeback
Message-ID<rpTXP-3o7-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
It looks like a bug on cgroup writeback. Is this a regression or
consistent issue? If it's a regression, you may could do bisect to
find out the buggy commit.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:19 PM, zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> wrote:
> cgroup writeback support the filesystem both ext4 and ext2.
> but,  it appears to be not work when I test the function in the ext4.
> The example is as follows:
> echo "8:0 1048576" > blkio.throttle.write_bps_device
> echo $$ > cgroup.procs
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/test.c bs=1M count=10240
> 10240+0 records in
> 10240+0 records out
> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 49.8796 s, 215 MB/s
>
> Furthering test find that the ratelimit will be limited if it write data
> to disk directly.  Additionly, The read ratelimit is limited whther it go through
> the page cache or not.
>
> The kernel version is 4.6  I have tested,  And the corresponding files
> in the attachment



-- 
Thanks
    Alex

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web