Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1380723 > unrolled thread

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

Started byArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
First post2016-04-17 11:50 +0200
Last post2016-04-17 11:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-17 11:50 +0200

#1380723 — Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-04-17 11:50 +0200
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
Message-ID<roRv3-24R-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wednesday 13 April 2016 11:15:13 David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:50:28 +1000
> 
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > allmodconfig) failed like thisi (this has actually been failing for a
> > few days, now):
> > 
> > ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.ko] undefined!
> > 
> > Caused by commit
> > 
> >   49425dfc7451 ("ixgbe: Add support for x550em_a 10G MAC type")
> > 
> > arm only allows udelay()s up to 2 milliseconds.  This commit
> > adds a 5 ms udelay in ixgbe_acquire_swfw_sync_x550em_a() in
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c.
> 
> Jeff, please have your folks look into this.  Probably just a simple
> conversion to mdelay().
> 

I sent a patch, pretty sure we can use msleep() here rather than
a wasteful mdelay().

	Arnd

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web