Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1375603 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set

Started byLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
First post2016-04-11 10:30 +0200
Last post2016-04-13 06:30 +0200
Articles 9 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct  property_set Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-11 10:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct  property_set Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-11 12:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-04-11 15:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct  property_set Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-11 16:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-04-11 16:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct  property_set Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-11 18:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-04-11 23:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct  property_set Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-12 09:30 +0200
                  Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-04-13 06:30 +0200

#1375603 — Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set

FromLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date2016-04-11 10:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set
Message-ID<rmFon-2Ng-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:

> Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
> the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
> hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
> drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
> function can just create the instance of it on its own and
> bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
> 
> This renames device_add_property_set() to
> device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
> property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
> property_set.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
>  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
>  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
>  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
>  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
>  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
>  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
>  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
>  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)

What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
branch and send out a pull-request.

> Changes since v2:
> - Changed the function name also in raumfeld.c. Thanks 0-Day test for capturing
>   that one.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Added the new users of the property framework
> 
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> index 5a941bd..e216433 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> @@ -385,10 +385,6 @@ static struct property_entry raumfeld_rotary_properties[] = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -static struct property_set raumfeld_rotary_property_set = {
> -	.properties = raumfeld_rotary_properties,
> -};
> -
>  static struct platform_device rotary_encoder_device = {
>  	.name		= "rotary-encoder",
>  	.id		= 0,
> @@ -1063,8 +1059,8 @@ static void __init __maybe_unused raumfeld_controller_init(void)
>  	pxa3xx_mfp_config(ARRAY_AND_SIZE(raumfeld_controller_pin_config));
>  
>  	gpiod_add_lookup_table(&raumfeld_rotary_gpios_table);
> -	device_add_property_set(&rotary_encoder_device.dev,
> -				&raumfeld_rotary_property_set);
> +	device_add_properties(&rotary_encoder_device.dev,
> +			      raumfeld_rotary_properties);
>  	platform_device_register(&rotary_encoder_device);
>  
>  	spi_register_board_info(ARRAY_AND_SIZE(controller_spi_devices));
> @@ -1103,8 +1099,8 @@ static void __init __maybe_unused raumfeld_speaker_init(void)
>  	platform_device_register(&smc91x_device);
>  
>  	gpiod_add_lookup_table(&raumfeld_rotary_gpios_table);
> -	device_add_property_set(&rotary_encoder_device.dev,
> -				&raumfeld_rotary_property_set);
> +	device_add_properties(&rotary_encoder_device.dev,
> +			      raumfeld_rotary_properties);
>  	platform_device_register(&rotary_encoder_device);
>  
>  	raumfeld_audio_init();
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
> index 52db8bf..7478f6f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
> @@ -29,10 +29,6 @@ static struct property_entry __initdata wifi_rfkill_prop[] = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -static struct property_set __initdata wifi_rfkill_pset = {
> -	.properties = wifi_rfkill_prop,
> -};
> -
>  static struct platform_device wifi_rfkill_device = {
>  	.name	= "rfkill_gpio",
>  	.id	= -1,
> @@ -49,7 +45,7 @@ static struct gpiod_lookup_table wifi_gpio_lookup = {
>  
>  void __init tegra_paz00_wifikill_init(void)
>  {
> -	platform_device_add_properties(&wifi_rfkill_device, &wifi_rfkill_pset);
> +	platform_device_add_properties(&wifi_rfkill_device, wifi_rfkill_prop);
>  	gpiod_add_lookup_table(&wifi_gpio_lookup);
>  	platform_device_register(&wifi_rfkill_device);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index f437afa..6482d47 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -322,16 +322,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_add_data);
>  /**
>   * platform_device_add_properties - add built-in properties to a platform device
>   * @pdev: platform device to add properties to
> - * @pset: properties to add
> + * @properties: null terminated array of properties to add
>   *
> - * The function will take deep copy of the properties in @pset and attach
> - * the copy to the platform device. The memory associated with properties
> - * will be freed when the platform device is released.
> + * The function will take deep copy of @properties and attach the copy to the
> + * platform device. The memory associated with properties will be freed when the
> + * platform device is released.
>   */
>  int platform_device_add_properties(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -				   const struct property_set *pset)
> +				   struct property_entry *properties)
>  {
> -	return device_add_property_set(&pdev->dev, pset);
> +	return device_add_properties(&pdev->dev, properties);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_add_properties);
>  
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ void platform_device_del(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  				release_resource(r);
>  		}
>  
> -		device_remove_property_set(&pdev->dev);
> +		device_remove_properties(&pdev->dev);
>  	}
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_del);
> @@ -526,8 +526,9 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err;
>  
> -	if (pdevinfo->pset) {
> -		ret = platform_device_add_properties(pdev, pdevinfo->pset);
> +	if (pdevinfo->properties) {
> +		ret = platform_device_add_properties(pdev,
> +						     pdevinfo->properties);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto err;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> index 9b1a65d..210423d 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
>  #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
>  #include <linux/phy.h>
>  
> +struct property_set {
> +	struct fwnode_handle fwnode;
> +	struct property_entry *properties;
> +};
> +
>  static inline bool is_pset_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  {
>  	return fwnode && fwnode->type == FWNODE_PDATA;
> @@ -801,14 +806,14 @@ static struct property_set *pset_copy_set(const struct property_set *pset)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * device_remove_property_set - Remove properties from a device object.
> + * device_remove_properties - Remove properties from a device object.
>   * @dev: Device whose properties to remove.
>   *
>   * The function removes properties previously associated to the device
> - * secondary firmware node with device_add_property_set(). Memory allocated
> + * secondary firmware node with device_add_properties(). Memory allocated
>   * to the properties will also be released.
>   */
> -void device_remove_property_set(struct device *dev)
> +void device_remove_properties(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>  
> @@ -831,24 +836,27 @@ void device_remove_property_set(struct device *dev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_remove_property_set);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_remove_properties);
>  
>  /**
> - * device_add_property_set - Add a collection of properties to a device object.
> + * device_add_properties - Add a collection of properties to a device object.
>   * @dev: Device to add properties to.
> - * @pset: Collection of properties to add.
> + * @properties: Collection of properties to add.
>   *
> - * Associate a collection of device properties represented by @pset with @dev
> - * as its secondary firmware node. The function takes a copy of @pset.
> + * Associate a collection of device properties represented by @properties with
> + * @dev as its secondary firmware node. The function takes a copy of
> + * @properties.
>   */
> -int device_add_property_set(struct device *dev, const struct property_set *pset)
> +int device_add_properties(struct device *dev, struct property_entry *properties)
>  {
> -	struct property_set *p;
> +	struct property_set *p, pset;
>  
> -	if (!pset)
> +	if (!properties)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	p = pset_copy_set(pset);
> +	pset.properties = properties;
> +
> +	p = pset_copy_set(&pset);
>  	if (IS_ERR(p))
>  		return PTR_ERR(p);
>  
> @@ -856,7 +864,7 @@ int device_add_property_set(struct device *dev, const struct property_set *pset)
>  	set_secondary_fwnode(dev, &p->fwnode);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_add_property_set);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_add_properties);
>  
>  /**
>   * device_get_next_child_node - Return the next child node handle for a device
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
> index 5a8d9c7..7ddc4a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
> @@ -31,13 +31,9 @@ static struct property_entry spt_i2c_properties[] = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -static struct property_set spt_i2c_pset = {
> -	.properties = spt_i2c_properties,
> -};
> -
>  static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info spt_i2c_info = {
>  	.clk_rate = 120000000,
> -	.pset = &spt_i2c_pset,
> +	.properties = spt_i2c_properties,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info bxt_info = {
> @@ -51,13 +47,9 @@ static struct property_entry bxt_i2c_properties[] = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -static struct property_set bxt_i2c_pset = {
> -	.properties = bxt_i2c_properties,
> -};
> -
>  static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info bxt_i2c_info = {
>  	.clk_rate = 133000000,
> -	.pset = &bxt_i2c_pset,
> +	.properties = bxt_i2c_properties,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct acpi_device_id intel_lpss_acpi_ids[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
> index a19e571..1d79a3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
> @@ -71,13 +71,9 @@ static struct property_entry spt_i2c_properties[] = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -static struct property_set spt_i2c_pset = {
> -	.properties = spt_i2c_properties,
> -};
> -
>  static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info spt_i2c_info = {
>  	.clk_rate = 120000000,
> -	.pset = &spt_i2c_pset,
> +	.properties = spt_i2c_properties,
>  };
>  
>  static struct property_entry uart_properties[] = {
> @@ -87,14 +83,10 @@ static struct property_entry uart_properties[] = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -static struct property_set uart_pset = {
> -	.properties = uart_properties,
> -};
> -
>  static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info spt_uart_info = {
>  	.clk_rate = 120000000,
>  	.clk_con_id = "baudclk",
> -	.pset = &uart_pset,
> +	.properties = uart_properties,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info bxt_info = {
> @@ -104,7 +96,7 @@ static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info bxt_info = {
>  static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info bxt_uart_info = {
>  	.clk_rate = 100000000,
>  	.clk_con_id = "baudclk",
> -	.pset = &uart_pset,
> +	.properties = uart_properties,
>  };
>  
>  static struct property_entry bxt_i2c_properties[] = {
> @@ -114,13 +106,9 @@ static struct property_entry bxt_i2c_properties[] = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -static struct property_set bxt_i2c_pset = {
> -	.properties = bxt_i2c_properties,
> -};
> -
>  static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info bxt_i2c_info = {
>  	.clk_rate = 133000000,
> -	.pset = &bxt_i2c_pset,
> +	.properties = bxt_i2c_properties,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct pci_device_id intel_lpss_pci_ids[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
> index 85ad9ec..d9353c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ int intel_lpss_probe(struct device *dev,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	lpss->cell->pset = info->pset;
> +	lpss->cell->properties = info->properties;
>  
>  	intel_lpss_init_dev(lpss);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h
> index 0dcea9e..6941166 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h
> @@ -16,14 +16,14 @@
>  
>  struct device;
>  struct resource;
> -struct property_set;
> +struct property_entry;
>  
>  struct intel_lpss_platform_info {
>  	struct resource *mem;
>  	int irq;
>  	unsigned long clk_rate;
>  	const char *clk_con_id;
> -	struct property_set *pset;
> +	struct property_entry *properties;
>  };
>  
>  int intel_lpss_probe(struct device *dev,
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> index 409da01..86bc01d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> @@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
>  			goto fail_alias;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (cell->pset) {
> -		ret = platform_device_add_properties(pdev, cell->pset);
> +	if (cell->properties) {
> +		ret = platform_device_add_properties(pdev, cell->properties);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto fail_alias;
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> index bc6f7e0..9837f1e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  
>  struct irq_domain;
> -struct property_set;
> +struct property_entry;
>  
>  /* Matches ACPI PNP id, either _HID or _CID, or ACPI _ADR */
>  struct mfd_cell_acpi_match {
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct mfd_cell {
>  	size_t			pdata_size;
>  
>  	/* device properties passed to the sub devices drivers */
> -	const struct property_set *pset;
> +	struct property_entry *properties;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Device Tree compatible string
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> index 03b7555..98c2a7c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
>  #define PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO	(-2)
>  
>  struct mfd_cell;
> -struct property_set;
> +struct property_entry;
>  
>  struct platform_device {
>  	const char	*name;
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct platform_device_info {
>  		size_t size_data;
>  		u64 dma_mask;
>  
> -		const struct property_set *pset;
> +		struct property_entry *properties;
>  };
>  extern struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
>  		const struct platform_device_info *pdevinfo);
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ extern int platform_device_add_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  extern int platform_device_add_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  				    const void *data, size_t size);
>  extern int platform_device_add_properties(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -					  const struct property_set *pset);
> +					  struct property_entry *properties);
>  extern int platform_device_add(struct platform_device *pdev);
>  extern void platform_device_del(struct platform_device *pdev);
>  extern void platform_device_put(struct platform_device *pdev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
> index b51fcd3..ecab11e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/property.h
> +++ b/include/linux/property.h
> @@ -238,18 +238,9 @@ struct property_entry {
>  	.name = _name_,				\
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * struct property_set - Collection of "built-in" device properties.
> - * @fwnode: Handle to be pointed to by the fwnode field of struct device.
> - * @properties: Array of properties terminated with a null entry.
> - */
> -struct property_set {
> -	struct fwnode_handle fwnode;
> -	struct property_entry *properties;
> -};
> -
> -int device_add_property_set(struct device *dev, const struct property_set *pset);
> -void device_remove_property_set(struct device *dev);
> +int device_add_properties(struct device *dev,
> +			  struct property_entry *properties);
> +void device_remove_properties(struct device *dev);
>  
>  bool device_dma_supported(struct device *dev);
>  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1375665

FromHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-04-11 12:00 +0200
Message-ID<rmGNr-3F7-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1375603
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> 
> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
> > 
> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
> > property_set.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------

Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.

Otherwise I think we are covered.

> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> 
> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
> branch and send out a pull-request.

Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?


Thanks,

-- 
heikki

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1375891 — Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date2016-04-11 15:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set
Message-ID<rmKeo-6GA-79@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1375665
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>
>> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
>> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
>> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
>> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
>> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
>> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
>> >
>> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
>> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
>> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
>> > property_set.
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
>
> Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
>
> Otherwise I think we are covered.
>
>> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
>> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
>> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
>> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
>> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
>> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
>> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
>> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
>> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
>> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
>> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>>
>> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
>> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
>> branch and send out a pull-request.
>
> Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?

Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now.  I'm planning to move it to
linux-next this week

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1375982

FromLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date2016-04-11 16:10 +0200
Message-ID<rmKHo-7ch-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1375891
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> >>
> >> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
> >> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
> >> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
> >> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
> >> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
> >> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
> >> >
> >> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
> >> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
> >> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
> >> > property_set.
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
> >
> > Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
> >
> > Otherwise I think we are covered.
> >
> >> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
> >> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
> >> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
> >> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
> >> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
> >> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
> >> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
> >> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
> >> branch and send out a pull-request.
> >
> > Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?
> 
> Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now.  I'm planning to move it to
> linux-next this week

Please ensure you send out the relevant pull-requests.  Linus doesn't
look his best when he's angry.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1376002 — Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date2016-04-11 16:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set
Message-ID<rmKR3-7gk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1375982
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
>> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
>> >> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
>> >> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
>> >> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
>> >> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
>> >> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
>> >> >
>> >> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
>> >> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
>> >> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
>> >> > property_set.
>> >> >
>> >> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> >> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>> >> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>> >> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
>> >
>> > Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
>> >
>> > Otherwise I think we are covered.
>> >
>> >> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
>> >> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
>> >> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
>> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
>> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
>> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
>> >> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
>> >> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
>> >> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
>> >> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
>> >> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
>> >> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
>> >> branch and send out a pull-request.
>> >
>> > Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?
>>
>> Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now.  I'm planning to move it to
>> linux-next this week
>
> Please ensure you send out the relevant pull-requests.  Linus doesn't
> look his best when he's angry.

I guess you mean I should expose by device-properties branch and
notify the relevant people about that, right?

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1376154

FromLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date2016-04-11 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<rmMSS-m0-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1376002
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
> >> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
> >> >> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
> >> >> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
> >> >> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
> >> >> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
> >> >> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
> >> >> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
> >> >> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
> >> >> > property_set.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >> >> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >> >> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
> >> >
> >> > Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
> >> >
> >> > Otherwise I think we are covered.
> >> >
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
> >> >> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >> >> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
> >> >> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
> >> >> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
> >> >> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
> >> >> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
> >> >> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
> >> >> branch and send out a pull-request.
> >> >
> >> > Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?
> >>
> >> Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now.  I'm planning to move it to
> >> linux-next this week
> >
> > Please ensure you send out the relevant pull-requests.  Linus doesn't
> > look his best when he's angry.
> 
> I guess you mean I should expose by device-properties branch and
> notify the relevant people about that, right?

Exactly.  And the easiest way to do that is by sending out a
pull-request.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1376289 — Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date2016-04-11 23:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set
Message-ID<rmRpv-3Vw-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1376154
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
>> >> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
>> >> >> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
>> >> >> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
>> >> >> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
>> >> >> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
>> >> >> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
>> >> >> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
>> >> >> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
>> >> >> > property_set.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>> >> >> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>> >> >> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
>> >> >> > ---
>> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
>> >> >
>> >> > Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
>> >> >
>> >> > Otherwise I think we are covered.
>> >> >
>> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
>> >> >> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
>> >> >> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
>> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
>> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
>> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
>> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
>> >> >> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
>> >> >> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
>> >> >> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
>> >> >> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
>> >> >> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
>> >> >> branch and send out a pull-request.
>> >> >
>> >> > Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now.  I'm planning to move it to
>> >> linux-next this week
>> >
>> > Please ensure you send out the relevant pull-requests.  Linus doesn't
>> > look his best when he's angry.
>>
>> I guess you mean I should expose by device-properties branch and
>> notify the relevant people about that, right?
>
> Exactly.  And the easiest way to do that is by sending out a
> pull-request.

I hoping that sending a message with the relevant information in a
reply to this one will be sufficient.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1376526

FromLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date2016-04-12 09:30 +0200
Message-ID<rn0VQ-3lD-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1376289
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
> >> >> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
> >> >> >> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
> >> >> >> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
> >> >> >> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
> >> >> >> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
> >> >> >> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
> >> >> >> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
> >> >> >> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
> >> >> >> > property_set.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >> >> >> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >> >> >> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> >> >> >> > ---
> >> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Otherwise I think we are covered.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
> >> >> >> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >> >> >> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
> >> >> >> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
> >> >> >> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
> >> >> >> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
> >> >> >> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
> >> >> >> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
> >> >> >> branch and send out a pull-request.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now.  I'm planning to move it to
> >> >> linux-next this week
> >> >
> >> > Please ensure you send out the relevant pull-requests.  Linus doesn't
> >> > look his best when he's angry.
> >>
> >> I guess you mean I should expose by device-properties branch and
> >> notify the relevant people about that, right?
> >
> > Exactly.  And the easiest way to do that is by sending out a
> > pull-request.
> 
> I hoping that sending a message with the relevant information in a
> reply to this one will be sufficient.

Because of the nature of MFD, I end up doing this kind of thing a lot.

Here's what I normally do.  Normally in reply to the cover-letter (0/x):
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/12/138

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1377501 — Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date2016-04-13 06:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set
Message-ID<rnkBc-3qy-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1376526
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
>> >> >> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
>> >> >> >> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
>> >> >> >> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
>> >> >> >> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
>> >> >> >> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
>> >> >> >> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
>> >> >> >> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
>> >> >> >> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
>> >> >> >> > property_set.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> >> >> >> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>> >> >> >> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>> >> >> >> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
>> >> >> >> > ---
>> >> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Otherwise I think we are covered.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
>> >> >> >> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
>> >> >> >> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
>> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
>> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
>> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
>> >> >> >> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
>> >> >> >> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
>> >> >> >> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
>> >> >> >> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
>> >> >> >> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
>> >> >> >> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
>> >> >> >> branch and send out a pull-request.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now.  I'm planning to move it to
>> >> >> linux-next this week
>> >> >
>> >> > Please ensure you send out the relevant pull-requests.  Linus doesn't
>> >> > look his best when he's angry.
>> >>
>> >> I guess you mean I should expose by device-properties branch and
>> >> notify the relevant people about that, right?
>> >
>> > Exactly.  And the easiest way to do that is by sending out a
>> > pull-request.
>>
>> I hoping that sending a message with the relevant information in a
>> reply to this one will be sufficient.
>
> Because of the nature of MFD, I end up doing this kind of thing a lot.
>
> Here's what I normally do.  Normally in reply to the cover-letter (0/x):
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/12/138

OK, makes sense.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web