Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1375739 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement get_max_time_window

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement get_max_time_window Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> - 2016-04-11 13:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement  get_max_time_window "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> - 2016-04-11 16:20 +0200

#1375739 — Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement get_max_time_window

On 03/31/2016 02:28 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 08:27 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> The MSR_PKG_POWER_INFO register (Intel ASDM, section 14.9.3
>> "Package RAPL Domain") provides a maximum time window which the
>> system can support.  This window is read-only and is currently
>> not examined when setting the time windows for the package.
>>
> Usually this field has lot of junk. It is not supported uniformly.
> The system provides this value from another ACPI element called PPCC.
> If supported this will be in 
> 
> $ /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:04.0/power_limits
> $ grep . *
> power_limit_0_max_uw:15000000
> power_limit_0_min_uw:125000
> power_limit_0_step_uw:1000000
> power_limit_0_tmax_us:32000000
> power_limit_0_tmin_us:28000000
> power_limit_1_max_uw:25000000
> power_limit_1_min_uw:25000000
> power_limit_1_step_uw:1000000
> power_limit_1_tmax_us:0
> power_limit_1_tmin_us:0
> 

Thanks Srinivas.  Does this mean I should check for PPCC?

P.

> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>> This patch implements get_max_time_window_us() and checks the window
>> when
>> a user attempts to set power capping for the package.
>>
>> Before the patch it was possible to set the window to, for example,
>> 10000
>> micro seconds:
>>
>> [root@intel-chiefriver-03 rhel7]# echo 10000 >
>> /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
>> rapl\:0/constraint_0_time_window_us;
>> egrep ^ /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
>> rapl\:0/constraint_0_time_window_us
>>
>> /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
>> rapl:0/constraint_0_time_window_us:1:9765
>>
>> but from 'turbostat -d', the package is limited to 976us:
>>
>> cpu0: MSR_PKG_POWER_INFO: 0x01200168 (45 W TDP, RAPL 36 - 0 W,
>> 0.000977 sec.)
>>
>> (Note, there appears to be a rounding issue in turbostat which needs
>> to
>> also be fixed.  Looking at the values in the register it is clear the
>> value is 1/1024 = 976us.)
>>
>> After the patch we are limited by the maximum time window:
>>
>> [root@intel-chiefriver-03 rhel7]# echo 10000 >
>> /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
>> rapl\:0/constraint_0_time_window_us;
>> egrep ^ /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
>> rapl\:0/constraint_0_time_window_us
>>
>> -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>> /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
>> rapl:0/constraint_0_time_window_us:1:976
>>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Radivoje Jovanovic <radivoje.jovanovic@intel.com>
>> Cc: Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
>> Cc: Ajay Thomas <ajay.thomas.david.rajamanickam@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c   |   31
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c |    6 ++++--
>>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
>> b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
>> index 6c592dc..feb063d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
>> @@ -493,13 +493,42 @@ static int get_current_power_limit(struct
>> powercap_zone *power_zone, int id,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int get_max_time_window(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, int
>> id,
>> +			       u64 *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct rapl_domain *rd;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	u64 val;
>> +
>> +	get_online_cpus();
>> +	rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
>> +
>> +	if (rapl_read_data_raw(rd, MAX_TIME_WINDOW, true, &val))
>> +		ret = -EIO;
>> +	else
>> +		*data = val;
>> +
>> +	put_online_cpus();
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int set_time_window(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, int id,
>>  								u64
>> window)
>>  {
>>  	struct rapl_domain *rd;
>>  	int ret = 0;
>> +	u64 max_window;
>>  
>>  	get_online_cpus();
>> +	ret = get_max_time_window(power_zone, id, &max_window);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	if (window > max_window) {
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
>>  	switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {
>>  	case PL1_ENABLE:
>> @@ -511,6 +540,7 @@ static int set_time_window(struct powercap_zone
>> *power_zone, int id,
>>  	default:
>>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>>  	}
>> +out:
>>  	put_online_cpus();
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> @@ -590,6 +620,7 @@ static const struct powercap_zone_constraint_ops
>> constraint_ops = {
>>  	.set_time_window_us = set_time_window,
>>  	.get_time_window_us = get_time_window,
>>  	.get_max_power_uw = get_max_power,
>> +	.get_max_time_window_us = get_max_time_window,
>>  	.get_name = get_constraint_name,
>>  };
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
>> b/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
>> index 14bde0d..53fad0f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
>> +++ b/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
>> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static ssize_t store_constraint_##_attr(struct
>> device *dev,\
>>  	int err; \
>>  	u64 value; \
>>  	struct powercap_zone *power_zone = to_powercap_zone(dev); \
>> -	int id; \
>> +	int id, ret; \
>>  	struct powercap_zone_constraint *pconst;\
>>  	\
>>  	if (!sscanf(dev_attr->attr.name, "constraint_%d_", &id)) \
>> @@ -113,8 +113,10 @@ static ssize_t store_constraint_##_attr(struct
>> device *dev,\
>>  	if (err) \
>>  		return -EINVAL; \
>>  	if (pconst && pconst->ops && pconst->ops->set_##_attr) { \
>> -		if (!pconst->ops->set_##_attr(power_zone, id,
>> value)) \
>> +		ret = pconst->ops->set_##_attr(power_zone, id,
>> value); \
>> +		if (!ret) \
>>  			return count; \
>> +		return ret; \
>>  	} \
>>  	\
>>  	return -ENODATA; \

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1376008 — Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement get_max_time_window

On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 07:33 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> 
> On 03/31/2016 02:28 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 08:27 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > > The MSR_PKG_POWER_INFO register (Intel ASDM, section 14.9.3
> > > "Package RAPL Domain") provides a maximum time window which the
> > > system can support.  This window is read-only and is currently
> > > not examined when setting the time windows for the package.
> > > 
> > Usually this field has lot of junk. It is not supported uniformly.
> > The system provides this value from another ACPI element called
> > PPCC.
> > If supported this will be in 
> > 
> > $ /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:04.0/power_limits
> > $ grep . *
> > power_limit_0_max_uw:15000000
> > power_limit_0_min_uw:125000
> > power_limit_0_step_uw:1000000
> > power_limit_0_tmax_us:32000000
> > power_limit_0_tmin_us:28000000
> > power_limit_1_max_uw:25000000
> > power_limit_1_min_uw:25000000
> > power_limit_1_step_uw:1000000
> > power_limit_1_tmax_us:0
> > power_limit_1_tmin_us:0
> > 
> 
> Thanks Srinivas.  Does this mean I should check for PPCC?
If your platform has support for this element.
Are you trying to solve specific problem or implement some feature
using RAPL? May be we can help, what time window to set.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> 
> P.
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Srinivas
> > > This patch implements get_max_time_window_us() and checks the
> > > window
> > > when
> > > a user attempts to set power capping for the package.
> > > 
> > > Before the patch it was possible to set the window to, for
> > > example,
> > > 10000
> > > micro seconds:
> > > 
> > > [root@intel-chiefriver-03 rhel7]# echo 10000 >
> > > /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
> > > rapl\:0/constraint_0_time_window_us;
> > > egrep ^ /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
> > > rapl\:0/constraint_0_time_window_us
> > > 
> > > /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
> > > rapl:0/constraint_0_time_window_us:1:9765
> > > 
> > > but from 'turbostat -d', the package is limited to 976us:
> > > 
> > > cpu0: MSR_PKG_POWER_INFO: 0x01200168 (45 W TDP, RAPL 36 - 0 W,
> > > 0.000977 sec.)
> > > 
> > > (Note, there appears to be a rounding issue in turbostat which
> > > needs
> > > to
> > > also be fixed.  Looking at the values in the register it is clear
> > > the
> > > value is 1/1024 = 976us.)
> > > 
> > > After the patch we are limited by the maximum time window:
> > > 
> > > [root@intel-chiefriver-03 rhel7]# echo 10000 >
> > > /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
> > > rapl\:0/constraint_0_time_window_us;
> > > egrep ^ /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
> > > rapl\:0/constraint_0_time_window_us
> > > 
> > > -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
> > > /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-
> > > rapl:0/constraint_0_time_window_us:1:976
> > > 
> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Radivoje Jovanovic <radivoje.jovanovic@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > Cc: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
> > > Cc: Ajay Thomas <ajay.thomas.david.rajamanickam@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c   |   31
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c |    6 ++++--
> > >  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > > b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > > index 6c592dc..feb063d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > > @@ -493,13 +493,42 @@ static int get_current_power_limit(struct
> > > powercap_zone *power_zone, int id,
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int get_max_time_window(struct powercap_zone *power_zone,
> > > int
> > > id,
> > > +			       u64 *data)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct rapl_domain *rd;
> > > +	int ret = 0;
> > > +	u64 val;
> > > +
> > > +	get_online_cpus();
> > > +	rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
> > > +
> > > +	if (rapl_read_data_raw(rd, MAX_TIME_WINDOW, true, &val))
> > > +		ret = -EIO;
> > > +	else
> > > +		*data = val;
> > > +
> > > +	put_online_cpus();
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int set_time_window(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, int
> > > id,
> > >  								
> > > u64
> > > window)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct rapl_domain *rd;
> > >  	int ret = 0;
> > > +	u64 max_window;
> > >  
> > >  	get_online_cpus();
> > > +	ret = get_max_time_window(power_zone, id, &max_window);
> > > +	if (ret < 0)
> > > +		goto out;
> > > +
> > > +	if (window > max_window) {
> > > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > > +		goto out;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > >  	rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
> > >  	switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {
> > >  	case PL1_ENABLE:
> > > @@ -511,6 +540,7 @@ static int set_time_window(struct
> > > powercap_zone
> > > *power_zone, int id,
> > >  	default:
> > >  		ret = -EINVAL;
> > >  	}
> > > +out:
> > >  	put_online_cpus();
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > > @@ -590,6 +620,7 @@ static const struct
> > > powercap_zone_constraint_ops
> > > constraint_ops = {
> > >  	.set_time_window_us = set_time_window,
> > >  	.get_time_window_us = get_time_window,
> > >  	.get_max_power_uw = get_max_power,
> > > +	.get_max_time_window_us = get_max_time_window,
> > >  	.get_name = get_constraint_name,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
> > > b/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
> > > index 14bde0d..53fad0f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
> > > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static ssize_t
> > > store_constraint_##_attr(struct
> > > device *dev,\
> > >  	int err; \
> > >  	u64 value; \
> > >  	struct powercap_zone *power_zone =
> > > to_powercap_zone(dev); \
> > > -	int id; \
> > > +	int id, ret; \
> > >  	struct powercap_zone_constraint *pconst;\
> > >  	\
> > >  	if (!sscanf(dev_attr->attr.name, "constraint_%d_", &id))
> > > \
> > > @@ -113,8 +113,10 @@ static ssize_t
> > > store_constraint_##_attr(struct
> > > device *dev,\
> > >  	if (err) \
> > >  		return -EINVAL; \
> > >  	if (pconst && pconst->ops && pconst->ops->set_##_attr) {
> > > \
> > > -		if (!pconst->ops->set_##_attr(power_zone, id,
> > > value)) \
> > > +		ret = pconst->ops->set_##_attr(power_zone, id,
> > > value); \
> > > +		if (!ret) \
> > >  			return count; \
> > > +		return ret; \
> > >  	} \
> > >  	\
> > >  	return -ENODATA; \

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web