Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1373794 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-07 23:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-08 08:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() in sugov_exit() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-04-07 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() in sugov_exit() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-08 08:20 +0200
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 23:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() in sugov_exit() |
| Message-ID | <rlpOG-1Do-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Due to differences in the cpufreq core's handling of runtime CPU
offline and nonboot CPUs disabling during system suspend-to-RAM,
fast frequency switching gets disabled after a suspend-to-RAM and
resume cycle on all of the nonboot CPUs.
To prevent that from happening, move the invocation of
cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() from cpufreq_exit_governor() to
sugov_exit(), as the schedutil governor is the only user of fast
frequency switching today anyway.
That simply prevents cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() from being called
without invoking the ->governor callback for the CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT
event (which happens during system suspend now).
Fixes: b7898fda5bc7 (cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
On top of linux-next.
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -77,7 +77,11 @@ static inline bool has_target(void)
static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
-static int cpufreq_exit_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+
+static inline int cpufreq_exit_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+}
/**
* Two notifier lists: the "policy" list is involved in the
@@ -482,7 +486,11 @@ void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct c
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_enable_fast_switch);
-static void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+/**
+ * cpufreq_disable_fast_switch - Disable fast frequency switching for policy.
+ * @policy: cpufreq policy to disable fast frequency switching for.
+ */
+void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
if (policy->fast_switch_enabled) {
@@ -492,6 +500,7 @@ static void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(
}
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_disable_fast_switch);
/*********************************************************************
* SYSFS INTERFACE *
@@ -2060,12 +2069,6 @@ static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct
return ret ? ret : cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
}
-static int cpufreq_exit_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
- return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
-}
-
int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
{
int err;
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int c
bool have_governor_per_policy(void);
struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
#else
static inline unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -398,6 +398,8 @@ static int sugov_exit(struct cpufreq_pol
struct sugov_tunables *tunables = sg_policy->tunables;
unsigned int count;
+ cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
+
mutex_lock(&global_tunables_lock);
count = gov_attr_set_put(&tunables->attr_set, &sg_policy->tunables_hook);
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 08:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() in sugov_exit() |
| Message-ID | <rlxVT-82O-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1373794 |
On 07-04-16, 23:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Due to differences in the cpufreq core's handling of runtime CPU > offline and nonboot CPUs disabling during system suspend-to-RAM, > fast frequency switching gets disabled after a suspend-to-RAM and > resume cycle on all of the nonboot CPUs. > > To prevent that from happening, move the invocation of > cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() from cpufreq_exit_governor() to > sugov_exit(), as the schedutil governor is the only user of fast > frequency switching today anyway. > > That simply prevents cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() from being called > without invoking the ->governor callback for the CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT > event (which happens during system suspend now). > > Fixes: b7898fda5bc7 (cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching) > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> -- viresh
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web